Войти

The aviation expert told about the death of test pilots during the creation of the Su-24

2439
0
0
Image source: Фото: Сергей Александров / Коммерсантъ

The Su-24 tactical front-line bomber that crashed in the Perm Region is a complex, but time-tested machine. [...] Vadim Lukashevich, an aviation expert, a former designer of the Sukhoi Design Bureau, told about this in an interview with Radiotochka NSN.

According to him, the Su-24 is a difficult aircraft to pilot, during the creation of which several test pilots — from three to five people-were killed. "Then it was brought, it is a good front-line bomber, it is brought. He was born hard, because when he appeared, he had a lot of innovations laid down for that time, " said Lukashevich and added that the bomber is a complex machine that does not forgive mistakes and requires concentration.

The aviation expert stressed that there have been no problems with the Su-24 for a long time, since it is an absolutely used aircraft. "Therefore, if there is a failure of equipment, it is already due to old age or poor maintenance. And if the pilot makes a mistake, you can build different hypotheses — either he just made a mistake, or there is not enough training, or a big break in flights, or maybe weather conditions," Lukashevich commented on the previously mentioned possible cause of the bomber crash.

A front-line tactical bomber Su-24 crashed in the Vereshchaginsky district of the Perm Territory on August 27. Both pilots ejected. They are alive and taken to the hospital. A TASS source in the aviation circles said that the crew members received broken arms, but despite this, after landing, they independently went to the village of Zapolye for help and contacted the command by phone.


Varvara Koshechkina

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Продукция
Компании
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 02.10 20:09
Комментарий к "Вашингтон обозначил неугодные ему страны НАТО" и "«НАТО 3.0»: По какому принципу Вашингтон делит союзников"
  • 02.10 17:40
  • 0
Бадалян: Пашинян проигнорировал саммит ЕАЭС из-за созданного им образа «врага» в лице Лукашенко
  • 02.10 17:34
  • 0
«Это будет другая геополитическая реальность»: в Беларуси жестко предупредили Запад о последствиях провокаций
  • 02.10 03:57
  • 1
Путин поставил кабмину новую задачу в сфере искусственного интеллекта
  • 02.10 03:47
  • 1
Washington has identified the NATO countries it dislikes
  • 01.10 21:10
  • 1
В Ленинградской области испытали новейший боевой лазер для борьбы с БПЛА
  • 01.10 21:05
  • 0
Комметарий к "China.com (Китай): что делать, когда нет денег? Еще раз продать Китаю самолеты Су"
  • 01.10 16:56
  • 0
«НАТО 3.0»: По какому принципу Вашингтон делит союзников
  • 01.10 14:51
  • 8
China.com (Китай): что делать, когда нет денег? Еще раз продать Китаю самолеты Су
  • 01.10 14:44
  • 2
Вуз не должен быть сам по себе: КНР готовит реформу системы высшего образования
  • 01.10 14:23
  • 1
Главком ВВСУ: украинские истребители F-16 сбили тысячи целей
  • 01.10 14:15
  • 1
Российские «Герани» вывели из строя украинские F-16
  • 01.10 14:13
  • 16410
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 01.10 11:59
  • 1
"A truce is like death now": will Moscow and Kiev agree on a cease—fire on energy facilities
  • 01.10 04:23
  • 0
Комментарий к "Снять санкции, захлопнуть дверь НАТО: как Трамп и Путин достигнут согласия по Украине (Washington Examiner, США)"