Войти

In Ukraine, they explained why it is not worth putting a 120-mm gun on the T-64

4490
0
0
Image source: 7th Army Training Command from Grafenwoehr, Germany / wikipedia.org

In Ukraine, during the discussion of plans to modernize the existing fleet of T-64 tanks, the question of the possible installation of 120-mm "NATO guns"on combat vehicles was raised.

As the Defense Express portal notes, the lack of own production of 125-mm shells for the guns currently in service speaks in favor of this decision.

However, new 120-mm ammunition is also not produced, they will still have to be purchased abroad at much higher prices.

There are also a lot of technical problems that will make it very difficult to work in this direction. For example, to implement such plans, you will need a welded-rolled tower, which needs to be replaced by a regular cast one.

The existing loading mechanism of the "sixty-fourth" works only with Soviet separate shots and is not suitable for a unitary 120-mm ammunition. Therefore, we will have to make a new automated system, similar to the one used on the T-84-120 "Yatagan" with its installation in an abandoned space.

But the tower with a developed aft part, overhanging the engine and transmission compartment, will significantly complicate its cooling. As a result, the 100-horsepower 6TD engine will overheat, which will negate maneuverability, driving and operational characteristics. As a result, there is a need to refine the cooling system.

It should also be noted that all these innovations will increase the weight and increase the load on the chassis. If you redo it, it is again an additional expense. It is unknown how much time all these works will take in modern Ukrainian realities and how it will end.


Alexey Brusilov

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 04:13
  • 0
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"