Войти

The US announced the risks due to Russian hypersonic weapons

2441
0
0
Image source: Фото: Министерство обороны РФ / РИА Новости

The United States is unlikely to narrow the gap in the field of hypersonic weapons with Russia and China in the coming years, which may lead to potential risks for the former in the future, writes the American magazine The National Interest, citing a report prepared by the Congressional Research Service.

The document states that Moscow and Beijing are creating strategic hypersonic weapons, while the United States is working mainly on tactical weapons. According to the report, the development of the latter is much more difficult than the first, and therefore the United States has to increase funding for hypersonic programs to reduce the gap with the current capabilities of its potential opponents.

According to the Congressional Research Service, American specialists need to determine the conditions under which it is necessary to use hypersonic weapons, and the consequences of such actions. As noted in the document, such an approach would make it possible to determine the optimal budget parameters of the relevant programs.

According to the document, the United States currently does not have the means to counter Russian and Chinese hypersonic threats.

In June, the US Missile Defense Agency presented an animation with the detection,tracking and interception of a planning hypersonic block of an enemy missile.

In April, The Drive reported that the US Navy planned to test the Standard Missile 6 (SM-6) version of the Block IB, which in the future may become the" killer "of the Russian "Avangard".


Ivan Potapov

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Продукция
Проекты
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 04.07 22:53
  • 2
Появились данные о подготовке НАТО массированного прорыва российской ПВО
  • 04.07 22:48
  • 1
Система для борьбы с украинскими беспилотниками уже создана, но нужно время
  • 04.07 22:38
  • 1
Комментарий к "«Политический вопрос»: почему Турция хочет продать российские С-400 Южной Корее?"
  • 04.07 22:31
  • 1
Maximum combination: how a large-scale strike by the Russian Armed Forces is paralyzing Ukraine's defense infrastructure
  • 04.07 22:28
  • 1
The War Zone: Су-57 вооружили для охоты на дроны
  • 04.07 19:25
  • 16229
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.07 06:43
  • 0
К темам "«Ответ на 40-дневную операцию Зеленского». Россия нанесла самый сильный удар по Киеву" и "В Кремле рассказали о практически ежедневных встречах Путина и Герасимова"
  • 04.07 05:59
  • 0
Комментарий к "Стоило ли СССР прощать врагов после Великой Отечественной войны?"
  • 04.07 04:42
  • 0
Комментарий к "Министр обороны Германии заявил о переломной фазе украинского конфликта"
  • 03.07 18:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "Появились данные о подготовке НАТО массированного прорыва российской ПВО"
  • 03.07 15:17
  • 60
Improved ZSU-23-4M4 Shilka can also fight Tomahawk missiles
  • 03.07 01:42
  • 1
В США рассказали о новой роли Су-57
  • 03.07 01:32
  • 1
FT: Европа хочет использовать оборонный потенциал Турции на фоне разлада с США
  • 02.07 12:08
  • 4
Why does Russia need a new tank school in the UAV era
  • 01.07 07:32
  • 0
Комментарий к "Украина как краеугольный камень новой европейской стратегии (The National Interest, США)"