Войти

In the United States, they mocked Poland's purchase of M1 Abrams tanks

2255
0
0
Image source: Фото: Ints Kalnins / Reuters

Poland's purchase of American M1 Abrams tanks, which entered service with the US Army in 1981, is a "rather remarkable turn of events", since these combat vehicles were originally created "to fight Soviet and Polish troops on the battlefields in Western Europe," writes Popular Mechanics magazine.

"Ironically, M1 Abrams was originally created to fight Poland when this country was a member of the Warsaw Pact Organization," the American publication recalls.

Popular Mechanics notes that Poland was a member of the USSR-supported Warsaw Pact Organization until 1991, having Soviet-designed T-72M1 tanks, and then its own PT-91, created on the basis of the T-72. The Polish army also has German-made Leopard 2 A4 and A5 tanks.

"While the Leopard 2 is relatively new, the T-72M1 and PT-91 tanks are outdated by modern standards and, therefore, need to be replaced. 250 units of M1 Abrams will make Poland one of the most powerful tank forces in Europe," the publication says.

In June, the Defense News publication, referring to the Polish press, reported that the Polish Defense Ministry is negotiating with the American side about the possible purchase of up to 250 tanks of the M1A2 SEPv3 version. Also, as part of the deal, Poland wanted to buy ten tracked vehicles from the United States, which will be required for training. The total amount of the transaction varies from 2.9 to five billion dollars. According to the publication, M1 Abrams should replace the T-72 and PT-91 tanks.


Ivan Potapov

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 22.03 18:11
  • 756
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 22.03 16:22
  • 22
Мультизадачная гиперзвуковая БРСД на "стэлс" платформах, как условие неядерного сдерживания
  • 21.03 22:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Названы российские подлодки 2050-х"
  • 21.03 21:16
  • 0
По поводу "Что было бы, если Российская империя продолжала бы существовать".
  • 21.03 19:40
  • 0
Что было бы, если Российская Империя продолжала бы существовать? (литературный ответ)
  • 21.03 19:01
  • 0
Что было бы, если Российская Империя продолжала бы существовать?
  • 21.03 18:48
  • 15061
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 20.03 18:43
  • 2
Патрушев: наша военная наука не отстает, а во многом опережает зарубежные разработки в области морских дронов
  • 20.03 11:55
  • 2
Прогнозируемая стоимость создания системы ПРО США "Золотой купол" выросла до 185 млрд. долл.
  • 20.03 00:53
  • 0
К вопросу о стратегии России в сложившейся ситуации.
  • 19.03 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "Проект: ядерное не сдерживание"
  • 19.03 18:38
  • 1
Названо количество запущенных Киевом ракет SCALP и Storm Shadow с начала СВО
  • 19.03 16:04
  • 0
Проект: ядерное не сдерживание
  • 19.03 14:27
  • 0
Москва — Минск: углубление интеграции – закономерно, естественно и взаимовыгодно
  • 19.03 13:39
  • 2
Why didn't China rush to defend Iran