Войти

"Armata" in Serbian: M-20UP1 never became a real tank

9337
0
0
Image source: jmantime / youtube.com

In Serbia, they worked on their own new-generation tank, which received the preliminary designation M-20UP1. Information about this was announced in the summer of 2015.

At the same time, several images of a promising machine were made public, which outwardly very much resembled the T-14 on the heavy unified Armata platform.

Just like the Russian model, the crew had to be located in the front part of the hull, in a well-protected armored capsule.

As the main armament, it was supposed to use a modernized version of the 2A46M gun.

The isolated ammunition consisted of 48 shells, although it is not known how many of them would be in the automated loading system.

To combat lightly armored and low-flying targets, a 30-mm automatic gun mounted on the right side of the turret served. There was also a 12.7 mm machine gun.

Another feature was the electric transmission. The power of the diesel engine was 1200 hp. The maximum speed on the highway was 60 km/h. Combat weight - 45,000 kg. The price of one copy is five million euros.

Despite the fact that the M-20UP1 project was well received by many foreign experts, it became clear even then that the car was unlikely to appear in metal. Creating a fundamentally new tank is a difficult task even for more technologically advanced states. In addition, multibillion-dollar costs were required for implementation.

Therefore, at present, Serbia is focused on the implementation of the program for the modernization of the existing fleet of M84 tanks and the development of the Russian T-72MS "White Eagle".



Alexey Moiseev

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 04:13
  • 0
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"