Войти

"Armata" in Serbian: M-20UP1 never became a real tank

9925
0
0
Image source: jmantime / youtube.com

In Serbia, they worked on their own new-generation tank, which received the preliminary designation M-20UP1. Information about this was announced in the summer of 2015.

At the same time, several images of a promising machine were made public, which outwardly very much resembled the T-14 on the heavy unified Armata platform.

Just like the Russian model, the crew had to be located in the front part of the hull, in a well-protected armored capsule.

As the main armament, it was supposed to use a modernized version of the 2A46M gun.

The isolated ammunition consisted of 48 shells, although it is not known how many of them would be in the automated loading system.

To combat lightly armored and low-flying targets, a 30-mm automatic gun mounted on the right side of the turret served. There was also a 12.7 mm machine gun.

Another feature was the electric transmission. The power of the diesel engine was 1200 hp. The maximum speed on the highway was 60 km/h. Combat weight - 45,000 kg. The price of one copy is five million euros.

Despite the fact that the M-20UP1 project was well received by many foreign experts, it became clear even then that the car was unlikely to appear in metal. Creating a fundamentally new tank is a difficult task even for more technologically advanced states. In addition, multibillion-dollar costs were required for implementation.

Therefore, at present, Serbia is focused on the implementation of the program for the modernization of the existing fleet of M84 tanks and the development of the Russian T-72MS "White Eagle".



Alexey Moiseev

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 04.07 10:16
  • 16225
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.07 06:43
  • 0
К темам "«Ответ на 40-дневную операцию Зеленского». Россия нанесла самый сильный удар по Киеву" и "В Кремле рассказали о практически ежедневных встречах Путина и Герасимова"
  • 04.07 05:59
  • 0
Комментарий к "Стоило ли СССР прощать врагов после Великой Отечественной войны?"
  • 04.07 04:42
  • 0
Комментарий к "Министр обороны Германии заявил о переломной фазе украинского конфликта"
  • 03.07 18:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "Появились данные о подготовке НАТО массированного прорыва российской ПВО"
  • 03.07 15:17
  • 60
Improved ZSU-23-4M4 Shilka can also fight Tomahawk missiles
  • 03.07 01:42
  • 1
В США рассказали о новой роли Су-57
  • 03.07 01:32
  • 1
FT: Европа хочет использовать оборонный потенциал Турции на фоне разлада с США
  • 02.07 12:08
  • 4
Why does Russia need a new tank school in the UAV era
  • 02.07 05:07
  • 1
Появились данные о подготовке НАТО массированного прорыва российской ПВО
  • 01.07 19:23
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Политический вопрос»: почему Турция хочет продать российские С-400 Южной Корее?"
  • 01.07 07:32
  • 0
Комментарий к "Украина как краеугольный камень новой европейской стратегии (The National Interest, США)"
  • 01.07 05:08
  • 1
Новейший украинский ЗРК «Риф» разместили на шасси советского ЗРК «Стрела-10»
  • 01.07 02:50
  • 1
"Political question": why does Turkey want to sell the Russian S-400 to South Korea?
  • 01.07 02:31
  • 1
Ukraine as the cornerstone of a new European strategy (The National Interest, USA)