Войти

The Pentagon explained the passage of the US destroyer through the economic zone of India

Sections: Sea, Global safety
1995
0
0
Image source: Фото: TASS/EPA/Shahzaib Akber

The passage of the American destroyer John Paul Jones through the exclusive economic zone of India was committed in accordance with international law and is not directed against the interests of the republic. This was announced on Friday, April 9, during a regular briefing by Pentagon Press Secretary John Kirby.

According to him, "this innocent passage" was carried out within the framework of normal operations and "in accordance with international law." The official representative of the US Department of Defense stressed that this is the responsibility of the American side "for maintaining the freedom of navigation" and "the freedom of the legitimate use of maritime spaces recognized by international law."

"This is not against any country. That's the principle. And we're doing it all over the world, " Kirby said. Washington calls such actions of the US Navy "operations to ensure freedom of navigation".

A spokesman for the US military department said that such cases often draw attention to when US actions of this kind are aimed at China with its "excessive claims to the sea."

"But it's not just about China," he said. At the same time, Kirby declined to discuss the content of conversations with India about the incident.

Earlier, the Indian TV channel NDTV reported that on April 7, 2021, the US Navy destroyer John Paul Jones passed to the west of the Indian-owned Lakshadweep Islands through the exclusive economic zone of India, without obtaining the prior consent of the Indian side.

In response, the Indian Foreign Ministry on April 9 expressed concern to the United States about this passage. The corresponding message is posted on the website of the Indian Foreign Ministry.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Продукция
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 19.06 01:41
  • 1
Why are Russian satellites better for their Starlink
  • 18.06 23:57
  • 16096
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 18.06 16:22
  • 0
Комментарий к "Журналист рассказал о «свинцовом облаке» для защиты ядерных ракет"
  • 18.06 16:09
  • 1138
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 18.06 05:40
  • 1
The military commander called for strikes on bridges and the elimination of the leadership of Ukraine
  • 18.06 02:12
  • 0
О Черноморском флоте в ходе СВО. Ценность, участие, потери.
  • 17.06 19:15
  • 0
Ответ на вопрос о целесообразности модернизаций ПЛА в Dzen'е
  • 17.06 17:24
  • 11
Запад готовится к превентивным ударам по базам ВМФ России, заявил Патрушев
  • 17.06 09:54
  • 1
НАСА профинансирует создание спутника-инспектора
  • 17.06 06:01
  • 0
Комментарий к "Польша приостановила передачу советских истребителей МиГ-29 Украине"
  • 17.06 05:52
  • 0
Комментарий к "У России предостаточно баллистических ракет. Украина не знает, как их остановить (The New York Times, США)"
  • 17.06 04:50
  • 0
Комментарий к "Эрих Вад о конфликте на Украине: "Это мясорубка, как Верден в 1916 году" (Berliner Zeitung, Германия)"
  • 16.06 23:28
  • 0
Комментарий к "Киев хочет получить $20 млрд, чтобы заставить Россию "гореть" (Politico, США)"
  • 16.06 19:23
  • 0
Комментарий к "Игнат: ЗРК Patriot сумели перехватить меньше половины российской баллистики"
  • 16.06 15:59
  • 1
Игнат: ЗРК Patriot сумели перехватить меньше половины российской баллистики