Войти

The submarine "Dmitry Donskoy" was called in the United States "an underwater monster»

1778
0
0
Image source: Фото: ТАСС/Лев Федосеев

Soviet nuclear submarines of the project 941 type "Shark" (according to the NATO classification - "Typhoon") frighten with their size, writes the American edition of Popular Mechanics on March 3.

It is noted that a total of five such "underwater monsters" were produced in the USSR, but today only the cruiser Dmitry Donskoy remains in service with the Russian fleet. Its length is 172.5 meters, width-23.16 meters, and height-11.58 meters.

"These Cold War giants are still the largest submarines ever built. Each submarine was..> wider than the average American home, and almost three times higher, " writes the author of the article.

According to him, the submarine contained 20 R-39 ballistic missiles, as well as a number of "unprecedented advantages" for the team such as a solarium, swimming pool and sauna.

The journalist presented in the article a comparison of the Russian submarine with the American submarine of the "Ohio" type. He stressed that, although the length of the cruisers differs slightly, the Russian submarine is much higher and wider.

"There may never be such a large class of submarines as Typhoons, but never say never," the author concluded.

On February 13, the American edition of The Diplomat called the active development of innovative technologies in the field of nuclear submarines of the Russian Navy a threat to NATO.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 21.04 01:41
  • 1
«Хаска-10» готова к серийному выпуску и работе в Арктике
  • 21.04 01:37
  • 8494
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 20.04 23:35
  • 21
Военкор: без десантных операций мощного прорыва обороны ВСУ российской армией можно не ждать
  • 20.04 09:53
  • 314
Главком ВМФ России: проработан вопрос о создании нового авианосца
  • 20.04 04:55
  • 1
О противостоянии ЗРС и ЛА
  • 20.04 00:29
  • 0
Ответ на "Эксперт Коротченко: истребитель F-16 ВСУ могли сбить ЗРС С-300В4 или ЗРК "Бук""
  • 19.04 20:12
  • 0
Ответ на ""Откуда взялась третья ракета?" Как был сбит украинский F-16"
  • 19.04 12:49
  • 2
19FortyFive: США могут забыть о F-47, поскольку Китай строит один истребитель-«невидимку» за другим
  • 19.04 02:48
  • 1
О Ту-22Мn, -95М, -160, Су-34, и ПАК ДА
  • 19.04 01:05
  • 0
Ответ на "На Западе назвали украинские F-16 устаревшими"
  • 18.04 13:35
  • 2
The Ukrainian BMPT "Sentinel" based on the T-64BV turned out to be a stillborn project
  • 18.04 04:20
  • 4
Ответ на "Российский бомбардировщик Ту-160М: самое неожиданное возвращение (19FortyFive, США)"
  • 17.04 06:53
  • 1
В НАСА заявили о готовности модулей станции Gateway
  • 17.04 06:33
  • 0
Ответ на "Будет ли военно-морской флот России сотрудничать с Китаем, чтобы бросить вызов гегемонии США на море? (Tencent, Китай)"
  • 17.04 02:04
  • 0
Ответ на " Названа новая задача Су-35С"