Войти

Modern technologies allow you to print a full-fledged assault carbine at home

2967
0
+1

Printed Carbine

For quite a long time, 3D-printed weapons were unreliable and often disposable crafts, which were enough for exactly one shot. But technology does not stand still, and today printed weapons are gaining more and more formidable capabilities.

In the first half of this year, the online community Deterrence Dispensed intends to publish drawings for the creation of a fully functional semi-automatic assault rifle. Along with the drawings, you will see lists of recommended printers and required components. The rifle (or, to be precise, a lightweight carbine for a pistol cartridge) is called the FGC-9-this is short for "Fuck gun control 9 mm" (To hell with the law on gun control – 9 mm). It will cost $ 100 to create it, taking into account the materials, and you will need a printer that costs about $250 to print it. In total, a functioning functional personal weapon can be obtained for $ 350, while it does not need to be registered or declared (we are talking about the United States-ed. TechCult.ru). Curiously, FGC-9 is completely legal. Its barrel is made of metal and is detected by metal detectors – this is an important factor that does not allow you to immediately ban the carbine as an illegal weapon. At least according to the norms of the current legislation of the USA. According to the reporters of the publication Slate, the ease of manufacture and non-accountability to the law have led to the fact that such homemade pistols and carbines are gaining increasing popularity among various extremist and far-right groups.

FGC-9

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
Original publication
  • The news mentions
Страны
Продукция
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 22.03 16:22
  • 22
Мультизадачная гиперзвуковая БРСД на "стэлс" платформах, как условие неядерного сдерживания
  • 22.03 16:05
  • 750
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 21.03 22:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Названы российские подлодки 2050-х"
  • 21.03 21:16
  • 0
По поводу "Что было бы, если Российская империя продолжала бы существовать".
  • 21.03 19:40
  • 0
Что было бы, если Российская Империя продолжала бы существовать? (литературный ответ)
  • 21.03 19:01
  • 0
Что было бы, если Российская Империя продолжала бы существовать?
  • 21.03 18:48
  • 15061
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 20.03 18:43
  • 2
Патрушев: наша военная наука не отстает, а во многом опережает зарубежные разработки в области морских дронов
  • 20.03 11:55
  • 2
Прогнозируемая стоимость создания системы ПРО США "Золотой купол" выросла до 185 млрд. долл.
  • 20.03 00:53
  • 0
К вопросу о стратегии России в сложившейся ситуации.
  • 19.03 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "Проект: ядерное не сдерживание"
  • 19.03 18:38
  • 1
Названо количество запущенных Киевом ракет SCALP и Storm Shadow с начала СВО
  • 19.03 16:04
  • 0
Проект: ядерное не сдерживание
  • 19.03 14:27
  • 0
Москва — Минск: углубление интеграции – закономерно, естественно и взаимовыгодно
  • 19.03 13:39
  • 2
Why didn't China rush to defend Iran