Войти

Kestrel vs Boomerang: how the Indian BMP is inferior to the Russian one

2859
0
0
Image source: rg.ru

The development of military equipment in India, as a rule, is conducted for several decades, and very often the result is not so successful.

The example of the Arjun tank is illustrative. It was created in the 70s, it was planned that it would become the main combat vehicle of the ground forces. The volume of the expected deliveries was estimated at more than 2000 pieces. However, in reality, the army has purchased only about 250 units and now expects a completely new generation of tracked vehicles from the industry.

In a similar situation, there may be a Kestrel wheeled BMP, which was going to replace the outdated Czechoslovak OT-64 armored personnel carriers and Soviet first-generation infantry fighting vehicles.

In 2012, its layout was presented, and two years later, a prototype was demonstrated. As reported, in the maximum configuration, the weight of the car did not exceed 27,600 kg. Crew - 3 people, places for transported infantrymen-9.

The engine power is 600 hp. The maximum speed on the highway is 100 km / h, and when overcoming water obstacles-10 km / h.

As a weapon, a turret with a 30-mm automatic gun from the BMP-2 produced under a Russian license was used.

It was stated that the armored vehicle has an increased level of protection, but is confused by the large number of loopholes and observation windows in the area of the landing section. Such a technical solution does not contribute to high resistance to the means of destruction.

There are opinions that the Kestrel in its current form is still inferior to modern models of foreign armored vehicles, for example, the Russian "Boomerang". Our unified platform is better armored and more functional. For example, its weight can be increased to 34,400 kg, and the 750-horsepower engine allows for high mobility and maneuverability characteristics. The same applies to weapons - the installation of various rocket-gun combat modules, including uninhabited ones, is provided.

The Indian BMP does not have such capabilities, so, according to many military experts, it will not be able to become a truly mass armored vehicle.


Alexei Brusilov, Alexei Moiseev

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 11.10 09:39
  • 11
Основатель Amazon объявил о создании тяжелой космической ракеты
  • 11.10 09:15
  • 5
Improved ZSU-23-4M4 Shilka can also fight Tomahawk missiles
  • 11.10 08:58
  • 10788
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 11.10 08:20
  • 2
I am the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Poland. And here's how to negotiate with Putin (The New York Times, USA)
  • 10.10 19:22
  • 0
Ответ на "Систем ПВО и ПРО России оказалось недостаточно для отражения атак ВСУ"
  • 10.10 19:19
  • 4
Украина вряд ли получит ракеты Tomahawk из-за опасности конфликта РФ и США
  • 10.10 18:57
  • 1
В США рассказали о кошмаре «опережающего физику» российского МиГ-41
  • 10.10 18:51
  • 1
Ответ на "Убийцей крылатых ракет "Томагавк" является 2С38 "Деривация-ПВО""
  • 10.10 18:30
  • 0
По поводу потока славянского сознания в "Я — министр иностранных дел Польши. И вот как нужно вести переговоры с Путиным (The New York Times, США)"
  • 10.10 17:16
  • 11
Для защиты заводов по переработке нефти развернули передвижные группы ПВО
  • 10.10 06:52
  • 0
Комментарий к "Patriot назвали позором США"
  • 10.10 05:46
  • 0
Комментарий к ""Теперь без защиты". Пентагон признал критическое отставание от России"
  • 10.10 04:54
  • 0
К вопросу о возможных действиях русских в случае реальной эскалации до войны
  • 10.10 01:19
  • 1
Лавров призвал пересмотреть функционал российских сил в Сирии
  • 09.10 22:16
  • 2
Стало известно о способе России «приставить пистолет к жирной заднице США»