Войти

Engines for rockets "Soyuz-5" and "Angara" has successfully passed the fire tests

3303
0
+4
Image source: http://www.globallookpress.com/

The scientific and testing complex of NPO Energomash reported that the tests that took place in January were carried out in full and were carried out in normal mode

MOSCOW, January 28. /TASS/. The RD-171MV and RD-191 rocket engines for the Soyuz and Angara carriers have successfully passed fire tests. This was reported on Thursday in the press service of the NGO "Energomash".

"Fire tests of the RD-171MV liquid-propellant rocket engine designed for the Soyuz-5 rocket were conducted at the NPO Energomash scientific and test complex," the report says.

Also, fire tests of the RD-191 rocket engine developed and produced by NPO Energomash for the Russian Angara rocket were successfully and fully carried out, the company said.

They stressed that the tests that took place in January were carried out in full and were carried out in normal mode.

In December 2020, the head of Roscosmos, Dmitry Rogozin, reported on the first full-size fire test of the world's most powerful liquid rocket engine, the RD-171MV, all parameters were normal. The RD-171MV engine is being developed for a promising medium-class Soyuz-5 launch vehicle and a super-heavy rocket.

The basic RD-191 is a single-chamber engine with a vertically positioned turbopump unit. Its development began in late 1998. This engine with afterburning of oxidative gas is designed for the family of domestic launch vehicles "Angara". The design of the product is based on the design of the RD-170/171 engines.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 22.03 01:40
  • 731
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 21.03 22:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Названы российские подлодки 2050-х"
  • 21.03 21:16
  • 0
По поводу "Что было бы, если Российская империя продолжала бы существовать".
  • 21.03 19:40
  • 0
Что было бы, если Российская Империя продолжала бы существовать? (литературный ответ)
  • 21.03 19:01
  • 0
Что было бы, если Российская Империя продолжала бы существовать?
  • 21.03 18:48
  • 15061
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 21.03 17:30
  • 13
Мультизадачная гиперзвуковая БРСД на "стэлс" платформах, как условие неядерного сдерживания
  • 20.03 18:43
  • 2
Патрушев: наша военная наука не отстает, а во многом опережает зарубежные разработки в области морских дронов
  • 20.03 11:55
  • 2
Прогнозируемая стоимость создания системы ПРО США "Золотой купол" выросла до 185 млрд. долл.
  • 20.03 00:53
  • 0
К вопросу о стратегии России в сложившейся ситуации.
  • 19.03 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "Проект: ядерное не сдерживание"
  • 19.03 18:38
  • 1
Названо количество запущенных Киевом ракет SCALP и Storm Shadow с начала СВО
  • 19.03 16:04
  • 0
Проект: ядерное не сдерживание
  • 19.03 14:27
  • 0
Москва — Минск: углубление интеграции – закономерно, естественно и взаимовыгодно
  • 19.03 13:39
  • 2
Why didn't China rush to defend Iran