Войти

The US published data on non-combat losses of military aircraft for 2013-2020

5215
0
0
Image source: french.almanar.com.lb

The national Commission on Military Aviation Safety of the United States (National Commission on Military Aviation Safety) summed up the results of non-combat losses of American military aviation in the period from 2013 to December 1, 2020. According to the report, 186 aircraft and 224 pilots were lost during this period.

According to the Commission's calculations, over the period from 2013 to 2018, the US military aviation lost 157 aircraft of various types, as well as 198 pilots, in 6 thousand non-combat-related accidents. The total cost of lost aircraft during this time was 9.4 billion dollars. For the period 2019-2020, non-combat losses of US military aviation amounted to 29 more aircraft and 26 dead pilots. The damage amounted to $ 2.25 billion.

Thus, from 2013 to December 1, 2020, non-combat losses of us military aviation amounted to 186 aircraft and 224 pilots, and the total cost of lost aircraft was 11.6 billion dollars.

The document emphasizes that despite the high costs of training flight personnel, non-combat losses of US military aviation are too large.

As an example, the cost of training fighter and bomber pilots is given. In particular, the basic training of a qualified f-16 pilot is estimated at $ 5.6 million, and the F-22 at $ 10.9 million. Training of B-1 bomber pilots is estimated at $ 7.3 million, and B-52-at $ 9.7 million. Training of military transport aviation pilots is cheaper. According to the Commission, the cost per pilot of the C-17 is 1.1 million dollars, C-130J - 2.5 million. Training of reconnaissance aircraft and AWACS pilots costs an average of $ 5.5 million.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Продукция
Проекты
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 19.06 03:44
  • 16097
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 19.06 01:41
  • 1
Why are Russian satellites better for their Starlink
  • 18.06 16:22
  • 0
Комментарий к "Журналист рассказал о «свинцовом облаке» для защиты ядерных ракет"
  • 18.06 16:09
  • 1138
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 18.06 05:40
  • 1
The military commander called for strikes on bridges and the elimination of the leadership of Ukraine
  • 18.06 02:12
  • 0
О Черноморском флоте в ходе СВО. Ценность, участие, потери.
  • 17.06 19:15
  • 0
Ответ на вопрос о целесообразности модернизаций ПЛА в Dzen'е
  • 17.06 17:24
  • 11
Запад готовится к превентивным ударам по базам ВМФ России, заявил Патрушев
  • 17.06 09:54
  • 1
НАСА профинансирует создание спутника-инспектора
  • 17.06 06:01
  • 0
Комментарий к "Польша приостановила передачу советских истребителей МиГ-29 Украине"
  • 17.06 05:52
  • 0
Комментарий к "У России предостаточно баллистических ракет. Украина не знает, как их остановить (The New York Times, США)"
  • 17.06 04:50
  • 0
Комментарий к "Эрих Вад о конфликте на Украине: "Это мясорубка, как Верден в 1916 году" (Berliner Zeitung, Германия)"
  • 16.06 23:28
  • 0
Комментарий к "Киев хочет получить $20 млрд, чтобы заставить Россию "гореть" (Politico, США)"
  • 16.06 19:23
  • 0
Комментарий к "Игнат: ЗРК Patriot сумели перехватить меньше половины российской баллистики"
  • 16.06 15:59
  • 1
Игнат: ЗРК Patriot сумели перехватить меньше половины российской баллистики