Войти

The US published data on non-combat losses of military aircraft for 2013-2020

4843
0
0
Image source: french.almanar.com.lb

The national Commission on Military Aviation Safety of the United States (National Commission on Military Aviation Safety) summed up the results of non-combat losses of American military aviation in the period from 2013 to December 1, 2020. According to the report, 186 aircraft and 224 pilots were lost during this period.

According to the Commission's calculations, over the period from 2013 to 2018, the US military aviation lost 157 aircraft of various types, as well as 198 pilots, in 6 thousand non-combat-related accidents. The total cost of lost aircraft during this time was 9.4 billion dollars. For the period 2019-2020, non-combat losses of US military aviation amounted to 29 more aircraft and 26 dead pilots. The damage amounted to $ 2.25 billion.

Thus, from 2013 to December 1, 2020, non-combat losses of us military aviation amounted to 186 aircraft and 224 pilots, and the total cost of lost aircraft was 11.6 billion dollars.

The document emphasizes that despite the high costs of training flight personnel, non-combat losses of US military aviation are too large.

As an example, the cost of training fighter and bomber pilots is given. In particular, the basic training of a qualified f-16 pilot is estimated at $ 5.6 million, and the F-22 at $ 10.9 million. Training of B-1 bomber pilots is estimated at $ 7.3 million, and B-52-at $ 9.7 million. Training of military transport aviation pilots is cheaper. According to the Commission, the cost per pilot of the C-17 is 1.1 million dollars, C-130J - 2.5 million. Training of reconnaissance aircraft and AWACS pilots costs an average of $ 5.5 million.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Продукция
Проекты
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 24.02 03:22
  • 9
Искусственный интеллект - реальность, которую поздно отрицать
  • 24.02 02:22
  • 0
Комментарий к "Польским F-35 предрекли роль ядерных ударных самолетов"
  • 24.02 01:10
  • 14625
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 24.02 00:25
  • 0
Комментарий к "Польша намерена возглавить Европу, сместив Германию и Францию"
  • 23.02 22:26
  • 0
Продолжение комментария к "О чем думал..."
  • 23.02 22:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "О чем думал Советский Союз, наблюдая за операцией "Буря в пустыне"? (We Are The Mighty, США)"
  • 23.02 19:34
  • 2
Российское «Око» заметили в зоне СВО
  • 23.02 16:35
  • 3
В США сочли правильным оставить Россию без «Адмирала Кузнецова»
  • 23.02 11:08
  • 6
И еще о росте производства в богоспасаемой империи св. Николая II
  • 23.02 00:53
  • 0
Комментарий к "МиГ-23Б (32-24) – истребитель с крылом изменяемой стреловидности"
  • 22.02 22:09
  • 0
Комментарий к "Российский Ту-22М3 назвали самолетом завтрашнего дня", и к "«Отвечает требованиям завтрашнего дня»: военэксперт о роли Ту-22М3 на СВО"
  • 22.02 19:13
  • 22
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 22.02 15:22
  • 1
MiG-23B (32-24) – fighter with a variable sweep wing
  • 21.02 20:17
  • 1
Танк Т-90М очень хорош, а Т-90М2 должен быть еще лучше
  • 21.02 05:27
  • 0
К вопросу о "стратегических" и "дальних" бомбардировщиках.