Войти

The Hungarian General spoke about the difficulties of replacing the T-72 with the Leopard 2

3448
0
0
Image source: 7th Army Training Command/Wikimedia.org

The Hungarian army received the first Leopard 2 tanks - they will replace the Soviet T-72 in the ground forces. According to the military, the transition to a new type of tank caused a lot of problems-starting with the fact that the Leopard does not fit into the hangars built for the T-72.

- The road to the training ground where the crews are trained passes through a tunnel under the bridge. The Leopard doesn't go there either, so we have to let the tanks detour through the overpass, one at a time, because it is designed for a load of 80 tons, "Military review quotes the words of the commander of the 25th brigade, General Lerinci Gabor.

T-72 and Leopard 2 are representatives of different tank building schools, Russian and German. Cars are very different from each other. For example, the Leopard has an automatic transmission and manual loading, and the T-72 has the opposite.

- You have to get used to all this. This is more than changing the type of tank, " the General continued.

However, the main problem for the Hungarian army is not the rebuilding of roads and hangars, or even the manual loading of a German gun, but the lack of qualified personnel to maintain the Leopard 2.

- Training of technicians will take many years - they should be able to use the computer technologies implemented in the German tank, - the brigade commander complained. According to him, the T-72 also needs to be left in the army - it is only necessary to agree with the Czech and Polish colleagues on the supply of spare parts.


Anton Valagin

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 04:13
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"