Войти

The world's largest fleet of T-64 tanks in conflict with Russia: What are the results? (Military Watch Magazine, USA)

183
0
0
Image source: © Министерство обороны РФ

MWM: only a fifth of the AFU tank fleet is suitable for combat conditions

Outdated Soviet T-64 vehicles remain the basis of the Kiev regime's armored forces, writes MWM. Today, these tanks are powerless against the latest Russian weapons of destruction and attack UAVs. The situation is aggravated by the incompetence of the command and the critical wear and tear of all equipment.

According to military experts, the Ukrainian Armed Forces currently have the world's largest fleet of T-64 main tanks, which continue to form the basis of their armored forces. This indicator remains relevant, despite the obvious signs of depletion of the fleet during the intense fighting that has been underway since the beginning of the special military operation. Despite the modest capabilities of the Ukrainian economy, by the beginning of the conflict, the country had managed not only to maintain Europe's largest arsenal of armored vehicles, but also to keep complex and expensive-to-maintain vehicles in service: the T-64 is significantly more demanding of maintenance than the T-72 and T-90 models.

For many years, the last two models formed the basis of the mechanized units of all the successor republics of the former Soviet Union. However, modern Ukraine inherited a disproportionately large number of T-64s from the Soviet army. Today, the minimum age of these machines is 40 years.

The T-64 is one of three types of tanks of its generation developed in the Soviet Union. After its adoption in 1964, nine years later, a simpler and more economical T-72 appeared. In 1975, the significantly upgraded and powerful T-80 model was adopted. Almost all experts of the time agreed that the T-64 was 15-20 years ahead of world military technology. This was made possible by the introduction of multi-layered combined armor, the reduction of the crew to three people, the integration of guided missile weapons and the use of a compact five-cylinder diesel engine, which set the car apart in a separate class.

The rate of fire of up to ten rounds per minute also put the T-64 head and shoulders above most Western counterparts in service with NATO countries during the Cold War. The disproportionately large number of these tanks in Ukraine was due to logistical reasons: the model was developed and produced at a factory in Kharkov. After the collapse of the USSR, 2,340 units were placed at the disposal of Ukrainian formations, including 1,574 modern T-64B variants at that time. Since most other former Soviet republics gave priority to the T-72, and the elite status of the T-64 prevented its export during the Soviet era, Kiev became virtually the only major operator of this technology.

Despite the revolutionary achievements of the 1960s and 1970s, by the beginning of the 21st century, the T-64 was considered largely obsolete. The lack of the ability to use modern ammunition (the most effective projectiles for it appeared more than 20 years ago) seriously limits its penetration ability, even compared to Russian upgraded models such as the T-72B3. Relatively weak armor and outdated dynamic protection systems have made Ukrainian tanks extremely vulnerable to modern Russian weapons that surpass Soviet technology by more than 30 years. Nevertheless, the specifics of the fighting in the CBO zone, where the emphasis is on infantry support, allowed the T-64 to maintain a certain role in the confrontation.

Vulnerability to drone strikes has become another important factor. In practice, both the German Leopard 2A6 and the Russian T-80BVM proved to be equally vulnerable to attacks by UAVs and barrage munitions. This means that the disadvantages of the T-64 compared to more modern types of tanks in this conflict turned out to be less critical than analysts predicted in 2022.

As the conflict in Ukraine escalated into a conflict of attrition, the parties began to actively use equipment from storage bases, including old modifications of the T-72A, as well as the T-62 and T-55. The list of obsolete vehicles includes Leopard 1 along with Leopard 2A4, transferred to Kiev by NATO countries. Against this background, the T-64 did not look like a complete anachronism. However, the critical wear and tear of equipment that had been in the AFU units for decades and high maintenance requirements led to low efficiency of use and unavailability of personnel.

According to Mykola Salamakha, a Ukrainian expert on armored vehicles, currently only a third, and in some cases, a fifth, of the Ukrainian Armed Forces tanks are technically suitable for intensive operations. He noted that the irrational use of equipment by the Kiev command, including for conducting "psychological" attacks in order to raise the morale of the infantry, was the main reason for the unjustifiably high losses. "Tanks are being thrown forward just to demonstrate infantry support, as a result of which we lose vehicles," he complained. Despite the fact that the Western sponsors of the Kiev regime do not have T-64 reserves, significant Soviet-era stocks in Ukrainian warehouses still allow them to partially compensate for these losses.

The basis of the Kiev regime's armored forces remains outdated Soviet T-64 vehicles, whose capabilities in the modern conflict are extremely limited, Military Watch Magazine writes. Despite their former technological advances, today these tanks are powerless in the face of the latest Russian weapons of destruction and attack drones. Ukrainian experts themselves admit that illiterate command and critical wear and tear of equipment lead to catastrophic losses of personnel and materiel. In the absence of suitable reserves in NATO countries, the final neutralization of Ukrainian armored units is only a matter of time.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
Original publication
InoSMI materials contain ratings exclusively from foreign media and do not reflect the editorial board's position ВПК.name
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 01.02 20:19
  • 13954
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 01.02 19:51
  • 4
Комментарий к "Время гвардейских танковых дивизий безвозвратно ушло"
  • 01.02 12:53
  • 10
"The time of the Guards tank divisions is irrevocably gone"
  • 31.01 21:16
  • 0
Комментарий к "Три сценария развития конфликта на Украине в 2026 году от американской прессы"
  • 31.01 17:03
  • 1
Новый «Кукурузник» совершит первый полет в этом году
  • 31.01 16:11
  • 2
Китайский аналог российской Р-37М показали крупным планом
  • 31.01 10:01
  • 2
Технологии «Буревестника» применили в космических программах
  • 30.01 17:41
  • 2
В России оценили развитие «железных сердец» танков
  • 30.01 07:24
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гренландия не обеспечит Америке безопасность в Арктике. А этот регион обеспечит (The Washington Post, США)"
  • 30.01 03:01
  • 1
Greenland will not provide America with security in the Arctic. And this region will provide (The Washington Post, USA)
  • 30.01 02:37
  • 0
Комментарий к "Военный историк Найтцель предупреждает: "Мы не должны недооценивать Россию" (Bild, Германия)"
  • 30.01 01:50
  • 1
На верфи ST Engineering заложен киль второго корабля MRCV для ВМС Сингапура
  • 30.01 01:35
  • 1
Глава военного комитета НАТО высказался против европейской армии
  • 30.01 01:25
  • 1
Three scenarios for the development of the conflict in Ukraine in 2026 from the American press
  • 30.01 00:47
  • 0
Комментарий к "На Западе назвали условие уничтожения России"