Войти

"They will defeat China": US Navy officer urges to build non-nuclear submarines

1459
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

Submarines with the Yun Bong-gil Type 214 class of the South Korean Navy

For decades, the United States has been equipping its submarine fleet exclusively with nuclear submarines. Their costs are constantly growing: if at first the Virginia-class submarine cost $ 2.8 billion, now it is over $4 billion. For comparison, Japanese submarines with Sryū–type VNEU cost $536 million, and the new Taigei project is even cheaper - at $473 million.

To win the conflict with China, the Navy should replenish its fleet with small, economical submarines with conventional engines capable of launching cruise missiles.

- writes Lieutenant Commander of the US Navy [Lieutenant Commander] Jim Holsell on the pages of the USNI publication.

In his opinion, this will make it possible to compensate for the relatively small number of submarines that the fleet will be able to deploy in the event of a conflict. Even relatively small-sized submarines can have significant combat power. Thus, the Shin Chae-ho of the South Korean Navy, which belongs to the KSS-III class with a displacement of 3,000 tons, became the first attack submarine in history with a nuclear power plant capable of launching ballistic missiles. According to the officer, the United States should consider the possibility of creating a similar platform.

Image source: topwar.ru

The USS Newport News (SSN-750) Los Angeles-class submarine of the United States Navy

According to him, a group of such submarines will be able to effectively neutralize enemy surface ships (such as Renhai, Luyang and Jiangkai), whose missiles will threaten American aircraft carriers and amphibious assault ships. Currently, expensive and relatively small multi-purpose submarines equipped with the Mk 48 product, which is the most powerful of all heavy torpedoes, but designed to fire at close range, are responsible for this task. Given the development of sonar equipment in China and Russia, this is fraught with the death of nuclear submarines.

To deal with this problem, the Navy must have at its disposal an economical modern submarine armed with a powerful long-range cruise missile and powered by conventional fuel.

- The military is calling.

The UGM-84A Harpoon submarine-launched anti-ship missile is not suitable for the role of such a missile, since it fires from a TA and is incompatible with the Virginia-type nuclear submarines (that is, most submarines will not be able to use it), and Tomahawk Block V Maritime Strike tests are still ongoing.

Image source: topwar.ru

Tomahawk anti-ship missile Range

As the officer explains, instead of one Virginia submarine armed with 42 anti-ship missiles, the United States could purchase five VNEU submarines with a total salvo of 70 anti-ship missiles (14 missiles each) for the same money. They could be deployed at allied bases in Kura, Sasebo and Yokosuka (Japan), Perth (Australia), Subic Bay (Philippines) and Guam. Given the range of the current versions of Tomahawk, which is 900 nautical miles, all these basing options will allow American submarines to hit PLA ships.

The United States could develop a submarine project with VNEU or with rechargeable batteries in cooperation with Japan, South Korea and Australia, countries that have extensive knowledge and experience, in particular, they adapted the American BYG-1 combat control system and the Mk 48 torpedo for their submarines. New submarines can be built both at their own shipyards and at foreign ones, "without creating an additional burden on American shipbuilding," for example, at the facilities of DSME/Hanwha Ocean and Hyundai, or Mitsubishi and Kawasaki.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.08 06:28
  • 0
Комментарий к "Карл Маркс: философия, революции и геополитика — почему его идеи актуальны до сих пор"
  • 05.08 05:06
  • 0
Комментарий к "ПО СУЩЕСТВУ"
  • 05.08 02:36
  • 1
Ответ на вопрос "А стоит ли цитировать маршала Жукова"
  • 05.08 01:47
  • 0
Комментарий к "Рукопись о Баскервилях: деталь, после которой дело Холмса становится другим"
  • 05.08 01:04
  • 0
Комментарий к "Правда ли, что Россия проиграла Первую мировую из-за отсталости? Вся правда о главной военной лжи века"
  • 04.08 22:58
  • 0
Комментарий к "Медленное угасание "коалиции желающих" (The Telegraph UK, Великобритания)"
  • 04.08 20:17
  • 0
Комментарий к "Закладка, определившая эпоху: день рождения двух морских легенд" и "Испытание океаном: история головного эсминца проекта 956, который дал имя серии"
  • 04.08 07:03
  • 1
Китайские ученые сделали ночное видение полноцветным
  • 04.08 04:51
  • 1
The slow decline of the "coalition of the willing" (The Telegraph UK, UK)
  • 04.08 04:40
  • 16353
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.08 01:30
  • 1
Комментарий к "Голодомор. Ложь и факты"
  • 04.08 01:09
  • 1
Комментарий к "Нравственный вакуум: Может ли атеизм обосновать добро? Христианство как опора человечности"
  • 04.08 00:17
  • 0
Комментарий к "Города-предатели, встречавшие немцев как освободителей"
  • 03.08 23:00
  • 1
Solidly built: how do mobile firing groups work on the Tigers
  • 03.08 22:59
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему Красная Армия не смогла прорвать линию Маннергейма три месяца"