Войти

For the first time in recent years, the United States voted against the anti-Russian version of the resolution at the UN General Assembly.

987
0
+1

Image source: topwar.ru

The world continues to discuss the anti-Russian resolution of the UN General Assembly, introduced by European countries, which timed it to coincide with the 3rd anniversary of the start of a special military operation. The European version of the resolution is accusatory, once again labeling Russia as an "aggressor." The fact that it is NATO that is approaching the Russian borders, moving its military infrastructure closer and closer, the authors of the resolution, of course, decided not to take into account.

As a result, the resolution was adopted by a majority vote, but there are nuances. Such a resolution was opposed not only by such countries as, for example, Belarus, Nicaragua, Mali and the Central African Republic, but also by the United States of America. This is the first time in recent decades that the United States has voted against the anti–Russian version of the resolution. Moreover, Israel and the European NATO country Hungary voted against the anti–Russian resolution.

On the other hand, Serbia and Slovakia supported the anti-Russian version of the resolution, advocating "friendship", "partnership" and "mutual consideration of interests". The BRICS countries – Brazil, India, and China – prudently decided to abstain from voting. For example, the Armenian delegation to the UN did the same.

The final result was 93 countries in favor, 18 against, 65 abstained, and the rest did not vote.

Image source: topwar.ru

Meanwhile, another resolution was adopted in the UN Security Council, which no longer contains statements about "Russian aggression." At the same time, the resolution calls for an early end to the Ukrainian conflict. For the first time in recent history, the United States, China and Russia voted simultaneously for such a resolution. France and Britain abstained.

Russia's permanent Representative to the UN, Vasily Nebenzia, called such a vote constructive, pointing out that it (the vote) could become a starting point for a peaceful settlement of the conflict, taking into account Russian interests.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 04.07 12:43
  • 2
Российскую лазерную систему ПВО применят против украинского «Лютого»
  • 04.07 12:28
  • 1
"Tested on Russian drones": Sweden recognizes the start of deliveries of the Tridon Mk2 air defense system to Ukraine
  • 04.07 11:48
  • 1
Путин: российские штурмовики "без всяких роботов" действуют эффективно
  • 04.07 11:23
  • 1
В США порассуждали о новой роли стареющих штурмовиков A-10
  • 04.07 11:22
  • 2
The alarming US decision to suspend arms supplies to Ukraine (The Economist, UK)
  • 04.07 11:02
  • 9551
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.07 08:52
  • 459
Израиль усиливает меры безопасности в связи с опасениями ударов со стороны Ирана
  • 04.07 04:16
  • 2
Expert Kuzyakin: Ukraine uses marketing to recruit Russian citizens
  • 04.07 03:47
  • 1
Is Europe ready for war? (Financial Times, UK)
  • 04.07 03:20
  • 1
Ростех запускает свой токен RUBx
  • 04.07 02:45
  • 1
Миронов предложил создать морские ЧВК для охраны торгового флота
  • 04.07 02:40
  • 0
Ответ на "«Полный провал конкурента С-400»: в индийской прессе раскритиковали дебют китайского ЗРК HQ-9B на поле боя"
  • 03.07 22:31
  • 2
В добавление к "Интеллектуальные способности высших военных командиров"
  • 03.07 17:40
  • 1100
Израиль "готовился не к той войне" — и оказался уязвим перед ХАМАС
  • 03.07 14:31
  • 6
"An order for hundreds of vehicles is possible": the Slovak Wolf 25 AD armored anti-drone vehicle is being tested in Ukraine