Войти

For the first time in recent years, the United States voted against the anti-Russian version of the resolution at the UN General Assembly.

1515
0
+1

Image source: topwar.ru

The world continues to discuss the anti-Russian resolution of the UN General Assembly, introduced by European countries, which timed it to coincide with the 3rd anniversary of the start of a special military operation. The European version of the resolution is accusatory, once again labeling Russia as an "aggressor." The fact that it is NATO that is approaching the Russian borders, moving its military infrastructure closer and closer, the authors of the resolution, of course, decided not to take into account.

As a result, the resolution was adopted by a majority vote, but there are nuances. Such a resolution was opposed not only by such countries as, for example, Belarus, Nicaragua, Mali and the Central African Republic, but also by the United States of America. This is the first time in recent decades that the United States has voted against the anti–Russian version of the resolution. Moreover, Israel and the European NATO country Hungary voted against the anti–Russian resolution.

On the other hand, Serbia and Slovakia supported the anti-Russian version of the resolution, advocating "friendship", "partnership" and "mutual consideration of interests". The BRICS countries – Brazil, India, and China – prudently decided to abstain from voting. For example, the Armenian delegation to the UN did the same.

The final result was 93 countries in favor, 18 against, 65 abstained, and the rest did not vote.

Image source: topwar.ru

Meanwhile, another resolution was adopted in the UN Security Council, which no longer contains statements about "Russian aggression." At the same time, the resolution calls for an early end to the Ukrainian conflict. For the first time in recent history, the United States, China and Russia voted simultaneously for such a resolution. France and Britain abstained.

Russia's permanent Representative to the UN, Vasily Nebenzia, called such a vote constructive, pointing out that it (the vote) could become a starting point for a peaceful settlement of the conflict, taking into account Russian interests.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 23.05 08:15
  • 4
The project of the TVRS-44 Ladoga aircraft has been suspended
  • 23.05 07:40
  • 120
МС-21 готовится к первому полету
  • 23.05 02:03
  • 3
Путин рассказал, чем пополнится состав ВМС и ВКС
  • 22.05 22:49
  • 2
Europe's Backup Plan: NATO without America (The Economist, UK)
  • 22.05 20:47
  • 15868
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 22.05 19:47
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Умрем же, сограждане, за Украину!» Почему ядерного ответа НАТО не будет"
  • 22.05 11:51
  • 1
Shoulder straps will be put on Ladoga civil aircraft
  • 22.05 10:36
  • 1
"Let's die, fellow citizens, for Ukraine!" Why there will be no NATO nuclear response
  • 22.05 10:30
  • 1
Charges on "Daggers" and "dream machine". Putin and Lukashenko held a nuclear forces training
  • 22.05 10:24
  • 2
НАТО уличили в противодействии российскому ядерному «Посейдону»
  • 22.05 10:16
  • 1
Минобороны показало полет МиГ-31 с "Кинжалом" со спецбоевой частью
  • 22.05 09:29
  • 1
SpaceX published its financial statements for the first time and turned out to be deeply unprofitable
  • 22.05 05:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "США вернули еще один списанный бомбардировщик B-1B. Почему американские ВВС начал "воскрешать" устаревшую списанную технику"
  • 22.05 04:16
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему даже старый советский РКГ-3 оказался опасен для “непобедимой” “Меркавы”"
  • 22.05 00:51
  • 0
Комментарий к "Самая дорогая игрушка Пентагона: 15 миллиардов за штуку"