Войти

"Ultra-long-range": The US Navy confirms the deployment of an air-launched version of the SM-6 missile

1808
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

The US Navy confirms the deployment of an air-launched version of the SM-6 missile. It is characterized as "ultra-long-range".

This is reported by Naval News magazine with reference to the command of the US Navy.

They claim that these air-to-air missiles have the greatest range of all those ever in service with the American Navy. The new weapons were demonstrated to the public mounted on F/A-18E/F Super Hornet fighters participating in the RIMPAC 2024 exercises in Hawaii. It is important that now the US Navy has officially recognized the existence of SM-6 air-launched missiles and assigned them the name AIM-174.

The SM-6 air-based configuration (ALC) was developed as part of the SM-6 missile family and is now operationally deployed in the Navy

- a representative of the American naval command told reporters.

It is known that the missiles were transferred to the F/A-18 fighter squadrons of the CVW-2 air wing stationed on the aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson (CVN-70). After the transfer of these weapons to the American navy, the United States will receive ultra-high-range air-to-air missiles for the first time, analogues of which are already in service with some allies and potential opponents of the Americans.

Image source: topwar.ru

The exact data on the range of the SM-6, which was originally considered anti-aircraft and is in service with the US Navy, is still classified. But various sources estimate it from 370 to 450 kilometers. But even by the most conservative estimates, the range of this missile, according to the authors from Naval News, can be considered a record.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Продукция
Компании
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 04:13
  • 0
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"