Войти

Experts suggest that Iran used EW-simulated missiles to mislead Israel's air defense

1181
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

Details of the combined strike launched by Iran on the night of April 14 and the actions of Israel and its allies to repel the attack continue to emerge.

Recall that the Israeli command claims that "99% of the drones and missiles fired by Iran were intercepted." At the same time, there is a lot of evidence on the web of how Iranian missiles, one after another, hit targets without hindrance, including one of the major bases of the Israeli Air Force.

Image source: topwar.ru

Middle Eastern sources say that during the repulse of the Iranian strike, significant inconsistency in the actions of Israel and its allies manifested itself. More and more countries claim that it was their military that "helped Israel repel the attack." Among these are the USA, Britain, Jordan, and now France. At the same time, it is pointed out that often both Israeli air defenses and allied interceptors targeted the same Iranian missiles, which led to an overspending of ammunition to destroy one and a shortage of them to intercept others.

According to experts, Israel spent about 1.5 billion dollars on anti–aircraft missiles fired to repel the strike in 4-5 hours, although most of the missiles did not "find" targets in the sky. In this regard, suggestions began to be made that the Iranian troops, in addition to combat missiles, could use their imitation in the form of generated special signals by means of electronic jamming. This may well explain the statements of the same French that they were the ones who "shot down a lot of missiles", against the background of reports that many missiles of Iran's troops nevertheless overcame the Israeli (collective) air defense system.

Official Tehran has not yet commented on statements about the possible use of EW-simulated missiles during an attack on Israel.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 04:13
  • 0
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"