Войти

Experts suggest that Iran used EW-simulated missiles to mislead Israel's air defense

1417
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

Details of the combined strike launched by Iran on the night of April 14 and the actions of Israel and its allies to repel the attack continue to emerge.

Recall that the Israeli command claims that "99% of the drones and missiles fired by Iran were intercepted." At the same time, there is a lot of evidence on the web of how Iranian missiles, one after another, hit targets without hindrance, including one of the major bases of the Israeli Air Force.

Image source: topwar.ru

Middle Eastern sources say that during the repulse of the Iranian strike, significant inconsistency in the actions of Israel and its allies manifested itself. More and more countries claim that it was their military that "helped Israel repel the attack." Among these are the USA, Britain, Jordan, and now France. At the same time, it is pointed out that often both Israeli air defenses and allied interceptors targeted the same Iranian missiles, which led to an overspending of ammunition to destroy one and a shortage of them to intercept others.

According to experts, Israel spent about 1.5 billion dollars on anti–aircraft missiles fired to repel the strike in 4-5 hours, although most of the missiles did not "find" targets in the sky. In this regard, suggestions began to be made that the Iranian troops, in addition to combat missiles, could use their imitation in the form of generated special signals by means of electronic jamming. This may well explain the statements of the same French that they were the ones who "shot down a lot of missiles", against the background of reports that many missiles of Iran's troops nevertheless overcame the Israeli (collective) air defense system.

Official Tehran has not yet commented on statements about the possible use of EW-simulated missiles during an attack on Israel.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 01.08 13:08
  • 16348
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 01.08 06:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "Так какую же всё-таки роль сыграл Ленд-лиз"
  • 01.08 02:20
  • 0
Об эсминцах, раз уж пошел разговор о возобновлении их постройки в РФ
  • 01.08 00:27
  • 0
Комментарий к "Один стационарный С-200 закрывал площадь сорока дивизионов С-75"
  • 31.07 19:20
  • 0
Комментарий к "Модернизацию атомного подводного флота назвали важнейшей задачей для развития ВМФ"
  • 31.07 19:02
  • 2
Russia has announced its first destroyer program in 40 years. Urgently needed: Ocean-going warships (Military Watch Magazine, USA)
  • 31.07 18:51
  • 0
Комментарий к "Россия объявила о первой за 40 лет программе создания эсминцев. Срочно требуются: океанские боевые корабли (Military Watch Magazine, США)"
  • 31.07 18:09
  • 1
Госкомвоенпром: ОАО "АЛЕВКУРП" усовершенствовало оптико-электронную систему для ЗРК
  • 31.07 18:00
  • 1
Модернизацию атомного подводного флота назвали важнейшей задачей для развития ВМФ
  • 31.07 17:37
  • 1
Sea revenues: The Caspian Flotilla acquired its own aircraft
  • 31.07 17:18
  • 1
Минобороны: Россия обладает опытом создания масштабных группировок ПВО
  • 31.07 07:33
  • 0
Комментарий к "Чем же была более всего сильна промышленность Российской империи"
  • 31.07 05:53
  • 0
Комментарий к "Чего Европе ждать от задуманной США “НАТО 3.0”? (The Spectator, Великобритания)"
  • 31.07 05:08
  • 0
Комментарий к "Могла ли Россия потерпеть поражение в Первой Мировой Войне?"
  • 31.07 01:56
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему Суворов взял «неприступный» Измаил, имея меньше солдат, чем защитников"