Войти

Experts suggest that Iran used EW-simulated missiles to mislead Israel's air defense

1272
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

Details of the combined strike launched by Iran on the night of April 14 and the actions of Israel and its allies to repel the attack continue to emerge.

Recall that the Israeli command claims that "99% of the drones and missiles fired by Iran were intercepted." At the same time, there is a lot of evidence on the web of how Iranian missiles, one after another, hit targets without hindrance, including one of the major bases of the Israeli Air Force.

Image source: topwar.ru

Middle Eastern sources say that during the repulse of the Iranian strike, significant inconsistency in the actions of Israel and its allies manifested itself. More and more countries claim that it was their military that "helped Israel repel the attack." Among these are the USA, Britain, Jordan, and now France. At the same time, it is pointed out that often both Israeli air defenses and allied interceptors targeted the same Iranian missiles, which led to an overspending of ammunition to destroy one and a shortage of them to intercept others.

According to experts, Israel spent about 1.5 billion dollars on anti–aircraft missiles fired to repel the strike in 4-5 hours, although most of the missiles did not "find" targets in the sky. In this regard, suggestions began to be made that the Iranian troops, in addition to combat missiles, could use their imitation in the form of generated special signals by means of electronic jamming. This may well explain the statements of the same French that they were the ones who "shot down a lot of missiles", against the background of reports that many missiles of Iran's troops nevertheless overcame the Israeli (collective) air defense system.

Official Tehran has not yet commented on statements about the possible use of EW-simulated missiles during an attack on Israel.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 24.03 16:41
  • 15079
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 24.03 12:10
  • 3
Нужна ли России морская авиация, и, если да, то какая?
  • 24.03 11:46
  • 1
Трамп неожиданно заявил, что армия США временно прекращает атаковать Иран
  • 24.03 08:31
  • 793
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 23.03 22:40
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему Россия не может создать конкурентоспособный автомобиль, но производит лучшие в мире истребители?"
  • 23.03 21:06
  • 0
Комментарий к "Пехота ВСУ меняет свою тактику"
  • 23.03 14:38
  • 26
Мультизадачная гиперзвуковая БРСД на "стэлс" платформах, как условие неядерного сдерживания
  • 23.03 04:35
  • 1
The Ukrainian Armed Forces infantry is changing its tactics
  • 23.03 04:14
  • 3
ЦАМТО: союзники США заняли выжидательную позицию после призыва Трампа отправить корабли в Персидский залив
  • 23.03 01:59
  • 1
Бортников заявил о способности России привести в чувства спецслужбы Украины
  • 23.03 01:47
  • 1
Комментарий к "Главком ВМФ: заменим все устаревшие многоцелевые АПЛ на современные "Ясени""
  • 22.03 20:12
  • 0
Комментарий к "Путин: российские оборонные наработки еще пригодятся"
  • 21.03 22:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Названы российские подлодки 2050-х"
  • 21.03 21:16
  • 0
По поводу "Что было бы, если Российская империя продолжала бы существовать".
  • 21.03 19:40
  • 0
Что было бы, если Российская Империя продолжала бы существовать? (литературный ответ)