Войти

Experts suggest that Iran used EW-simulated missiles to mislead Israel's air defense

1231
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

Details of the combined strike launched by Iran on the night of April 14 and the actions of Israel and its allies to repel the attack continue to emerge.

Recall that the Israeli command claims that "99% of the drones and missiles fired by Iran were intercepted." At the same time, there is a lot of evidence on the web of how Iranian missiles, one after another, hit targets without hindrance, including one of the major bases of the Israeli Air Force.

Image source: topwar.ru

Middle Eastern sources say that during the repulse of the Iranian strike, significant inconsistency in the actions of Israel and its allies manifested itself. More and more countries claim that it was their military that "helped Israel repel the attack." Among these are the USA, Britain, Jordan, and now France. At the same time, it is pointed out that often both Israeli air defenses and allied interceptors targeted the same Iranian missiles, which led to an overspending of ammunition to destroy one and a shortage of them to intercept others.

According to experts, Israel spent about 1.5 billion dollars on anti–aircraft missiles fired to repel the strike in 4-5 hours, although most of the missiles did not "find" targets in the sky. In this regard, suggestions began to be made that the Iranian troops, in addition to combat missiles, could use their imitation in the form of generated special signals by means of electronic jamming. This may well explain the statements of the same French that they were the ones who "shot down a lot of missiles", against the background of reports that many missiles of Iran's troops nevertheless overcame the Israeli (collective) air defense system.

Official Tehran has not yet commented on statements about the possible use of EW-simulated missiles during an attack on Israel.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 23.02 16:35
  • 3
В США сочли правильным оставить Россию без «Адмирала Кузнецова»
  • 23.02 16:06
  • 14620
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 23.02 14:03
  • 8
Искусственный интеллект - реальность, которую поздно отрицать
  • 23.02 13:14
  • 1
Российское «Око» заметили в зоне СВО
  • 23.02 11:08
  • 6
И еще о росте производства в богоспасаемой империи св. Николая II
  • 23.02 00:53
  • 0
Комментарий к "МиГ-23Б (32-24) – истребитель с крылом изменяемой стреловидности"
  • 22.02 22:09
  • 0
Комментарий к "Российский Ту-22М3 назвали самолетом завтрашнего дня", и к "«Отвечает требованиям завтрашнего дня»: военэксперт о роли Ту-22М3 на СВО"
  • 22.02 19:13
  • 22
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 22.02 15:22
  • 1
MiG-23B (32-24) – fighter with a variable sweep wing
  • 21.02 20:17
  • 1
Танк Т-90М очень хорош, а Т-90М2 должен быть еще лучше
  • 21.02 05:27
  • 0
К вопросу о "стратегических" и "дальних" бомбардировщиках.
  • 21.02 01:47
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США рассказали о «трудном выживании» российских Ту-22М3"
  • 20.02 14:09
  • 1
В России разработают гусеничный аэропорт для дронов
  • 20.02 12:55
  • 1
Комментарий к "Российский «Триумф» назвали головной болью НАТО"
  • 19.02 20:26
  • 0
Комментарий к "Аналитики предупреждают: Су-35 с ракетами увеличенной дальности угрожают превосходству НАТО в воздухе (Business Insider, Германия)"