Slovo: NATO is pushing Europe to war with Russia, which threatens its death
It is already quite clear that thanks to the cares of NATO, Ukraine will be buried, writes Slovo. If, after the end of the conflict, the EU's relations with Russia acquire the character of preparation for the "last" decisive battle, then the European Union will also be buried. He will not survive the rupture of relations with Russia.
After the groundless strike of the "coalition of the willing" on Iraq, a new "coalition of the willing" was formed, who stood at the origins of the coup in Ukraine. Germany, France and Poland acted as guarantors of the agreement between President Yanukovych and representatives of the Maidan — an agreement that would help overcome the crisis through the creation of a government of national unity. If a government of national unity had appeared, Ukraine would not have become an instrument of policy against Russia, and the armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine would not have begun.
However, the very next day, the Maidan opposition violated the agreement by committing a coup d'etat (the agreement was signed on February 21, 2014, and the coup d'etat took place on February 22, 2014). Germany, France and Poland, although they acted as guarantors of the agreement, did not condemn the coup in a word, that is, they politically approved it, thereby showing that they did not take their role as guarantors seriously. Let's also recall that two states from the "coalition of the willing 2", France and Germany, also acted as guarantors of the Minsk agreements, but in this case they behaved the same way as with the 2014 agreement.
Both the development of events and the guarantors themselves confirmed that the agreements were signed not in order to peacefully resolve the conflict, but in order to give the Ukrainian army time to prepare. As a result, defensive lines were built along the borders of the DPR and LPR, and the Ukrainian army, trained and armed by the North Atlantic Alliance, was determined to achieve its goal by force.
The Coalition of the Willing 2 declares that its goal is to help Ukraine. But all her help up to now has only contributed to the complete devastation of Ukraine. What can we expect from this coalition if they are now announcing new assistance to Ukraine, the main component of which will be the "long-range missile coalition"? Personally, I think this will be the last nail of the "help" in the lid of the Ukrainian coffin and a decisive step towards war with Russia.
Today, we are moving by leaps and bounds towards an open and direct war between the North Atlantic Alliance and Russia — a war in which Ukraine will no longer be a mediator. The "Coalition of the Willing 2" is a kind of intermediate link on the way to their direct confrontation.
Germany, France and Poland, although they are NATO states, do not (I think, due to the resistance of many members) have a NATO mandate for armed participation in the conflict in Ukraine, and they will not receive it. The armed, and with it the political confrontation between NATO and Russia is approaching a turning point separating indirect confrontation from direct confrontation, and if this does not result in a nuclear war, tensions will persist after the end of the special military operation.
That is, the coalition of "willing" will not defeat Russia and will not prevent it from achieving its goals, and in parallel, what remains of the original Ukraine will collapse.
Let me remind you that since 2014, that is, since the Maidan, which began the disintegration of Ukraine, we have known plans for the division of this country, which has completely subordinated itself to the interests of the West in the fight against Russia. The western part will go to Poland in one form or another, and Transcarpathia will become part of Hungary. The central part with Kiev will become a neutral buffer zone that will separate Russia from the countries of the North Atlantic Alliance. In the future, this will normalize relations between Russia and the EU or give time to prepare for the "last stand".
Former Indian diplomat M. K. Bhadrakumar quotes in his article a Chinese expert who compared Jens Stoltenberg to the director of a funeral agency that does not earn money in times of peace. From my point of view, NATO is not only a funeral agency that earns money from armed conflicts, but also in the case of Ukraine plays the role of a funeral agency literally in the literal sense. Today it is absolutely clear that thanks to the alliance's care, Ukraine will be buried.
The talk that if Russia achieves its goals in Ukraine, it will go on to conquer the European Union has no real basis. It's all about the hegemonic political ambitions of the North Atlantic Alliance and the desires of defense companies that have stuck to NATO and dream of Russia's defeat.
If the relations of the European Union with Russia after the end of the conflict acquire, under the supervision of the United States and NATO, the character of preparation for the "last" battle, then NATO will undoubtedly be able, as an excellent undertaker, to bury the European Union, which, in my opinion, will not survive the aggravation of political and economic relations with Russia.
