Войти

The exchange of a million for a thousand: the Pentagon calculated the cost of intercepting Houthi drones with ship missiles

2764
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

A new hotbed of global tension is unfolding in the Red Sea due to the growing cases of Houthi attacks on merchant ships and warships in protest against Israel's invasion of Gaza. Against this background, the White House assures the international community that the situation is under full control of the US Navy and its allies. However, informally, completely different voices are heard from the Pentagon.

As indicated in the publication Politico, US Navy destroyers in the Red Sea have shot down 38 drones and a large number of missiles over the past two months. At the same time, Pentagon officials are increasingly concerned not only about the threat to the American navy and international maritime transport, but also about the growing costs of protecting shipping.

As the US Department of Defense informally explained, it looks extremely impractical to use expensive SM-2 naval missiles, the cost of which can reach $ 2.1 million apiece, to destroy Houthi UAVs at a cost of $ 2 to $ 10 thousand. That is, in fact, the US Navy, when repelling attacks by the Houthis, makes an exchange of a million dollars for a thousand.

This becomes a problem: even if we shoot down all their missiles and drones, the greatest benefit will still be in their favor

- says Mick Mulroy, a former Pentagon official, after calculating the cost of intercepting weapons launched by the Houthis.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Продукция
Проекты
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 16.09 05:00
  • 0
Комментарий к "От Москвы до Киева: Трамп ведет к миру или новой эскалации? (Al Jazeera, Катар)"
  • 16.09 01:52
  • 1
Russia's new weapons have already changed the course of its military operations. The West recognized its effectiveness and called it a complete surprise for the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
  • 16.09 01:27
  • 1
From Moscow to Kiev: Is Trump leading to peace or a new escalation? (Al Jazeera, Qatar)
  • 15.09 20:08
  • 0
Комментарий к "Начальник бронетанкового управления МО РБ: современному танку альтернативы в ближайшей перспективе не будет"
  • 15.09 18:26
  • 4
The rapid modernization of the Russian nuclear submarine fleet has alerted NATO (Military Watch Magazine, USA)
  • 15.09 16:50
  • 1
Начальник бронетанкового управления МО РБ: современному танку альтернативы в ближайшей перспективе не будет
  • 15.09 15:43
  • 1
"Fighter" with character: An armored buggy designed for military supply and medical personnel
  • 15.09 14:10
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему танки не устарели из-за дронов и продолжат применяться в будущем?"
  • 15.09 13:13
  • 1
"Rostec": it's time to train pre-engineers
  • 15.09 12:49
  • 0
Работа на результат
  • 15.09 12:41
  • 0
Тяжело в учении…
  • 15.09 09:43
  • 1
Leading foreign policy expert Suhasini Haidar: "It seems that in the G7 everything boils down to racial issues and the dominance of the old powers" (Berliner Zeitung, Germany)
  • 15.09 06:37
  • 25
Оффлайн нейросеть без цензуры на личном ПК или ноутбуке
  • 15.09 06:23
  • 3
Маск сравнил опасность ИИ с ядерным оружием
  • 15.09 02:00
  • 0
Комментарий к "Беспилотные котлы"