Войти

The exchange of a million for a thousand: the Pentagon calculated the cost of intercepting Houthi drones with ship missiles

2459
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

A new hotbed of global tension is unfolding in the Red Sea due to the growing cases of Houthi attacks on merchant ships and warships in protest against Israel's invasion of Gaza. Against this background, the White House assures the international community that the situation is under full control of the US Navy and its allies. However, informally, completely different voices are heard from the Pentagon.

As indicated in the publication Politico, US Navy destroyers in the Red Sea have shot down 38 drones and a large number of missiles over the past two months. At the same time, Pentagon officials are increasingly concerned not only about the threat to the American navy and international maritime transport, but also about the growing costs of protecting shipping.

As the US Department of Defense informally explained, it looks extremely impractical to use expensive SM-2 naval missiles, the cost of which can reach $ 2.1 million apiece, to destroy Houthi UAVs at a cost of $ 2 to $ 10 thousand. That is, in fact, the US Navy, when repelling attacks by the Houthis, makes an exchange of a million dollars for a thousand.

This becomes a problem: even if we shoot down all their missiles and drones, the greatest benefit will still be in their favor

- says Mick Mulroy, a former Pentagon official, after calculating the cost of intercepting weapons launched by the Houthis.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Продукция
Проекты
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 30.01 12:58
  • 13895
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 30.01 07:24
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гренландия не обеспечит Америке безопасность в Арктике. А этот регион обеспечит (The Washington Post, США)"
  • 30.01 03:01
  • 1
Greenland will not provide America with security in the Arctic. And this region will provide (The Washington Post, USA)
  • 30.01 02:37
  • 0
Комментарий к "Военный историк Найтцель предупреждает: "Мы не должны недооценивать Россию" (Bild, Германия)"
  • 30.01 01:50
  • 1
На верфи ST Engineering заложен киль второго корабля MRCV для ВМС Сингапура
  • 30.01 01:35
  • 1
Глава военного комитета НАТО высказался против европейской армии
  • 30.01 01:25
  • 1
Three scenarios for the development of the conflict in Ukraine in 2026 from the American press
  • 30.01 00:47
  • 0
Комментарий к "На Западе назвали условие уничтожения России"
  • 29.01 23:24
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США у российского Су-35 нашли серьезную проблему"
  • 29.01 21:03
  • 2
Пашинян рассказал о результатах выхода Армении из ОДКБ
  • 29.01 17:49
  • 2
The United States linked security guarantees to Ukraine with the surrender of Donbass (The Times, UK)
  • 29.01 17:40
  • 2
Теперь защищена и верхняя полусфера: Израиль показал работу КАЗ Iron Fist
  • 29.01 07:21
  • 1
UEC is ready for serial production of TV7-117ST-01 engines for IL-114-300 aircraft
  • 29.01 03:45
  • 1
В Иран прибыл российский «Опустошитель»
  • 29.01 03:02
  • 1
Why is the United States so interested in controlling the so-called Zangezur Corridor? (infoBRICS, China)