Войти

The exchange of a million for a thousand: the Pentagon calculated the cost of intercepting Houthi drones with ship missiles

2566
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

A new hotbed of global tension is unfolding in the Red Sea due to the growing cases of Houthi attacks on merchant ships and warships in protest against Israel's invasion of Gaza. Against this background, the White House assures the international community that the situation is under full control of the US Navy and its allies. However, informally, completely different voices are heard from the Pentagon.

As indicated in the publication Politico, US Navy destroyers in the Red Sea have shot down 38 drones and a large number of missiles over the past two months. At the same time, Pentagon officials are increasingly concerned not only about the threat to the American navy and international maritime transport, but also about the growing costs of protecting shipping.

As the US Department of Defense informally explained, it looks extremely impractical to use expensive SM-2 naval missiles, the cost of which can reach $ 2.1 million apiece, to destroy Houthi UAVs at a cost of $ 2 to $ 10 thousand. That is, in fact, the US Navy, when repelling attacks by the Houthis, makes an exchange of a million dollars for a thousand.

This becomes a problem: even if we shoot down all their missiles and drones, the greatest benefit will still be in their favor

- says Mick Mulroy, a former Pentagon official, after calculating the cost of intercepting weapons launched by the Houthis.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Продукция
Проекты
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 13.04 06:31
  • 1
Удар по базе США в Кувейте нанесли не дроны, а два Су-24 с иранскими пилотами
  • 13.04 05:37
  • 15504
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 13.04 04:47
  • 1067
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 13.04 03:08
  • 0
Комментарий к "Возрождение Третьего Рейха, или сатанинские* звезды над Германией…"
  • 13.04 02:08
  • 1
На Украине показали БЭК-авианосец
  • 13.04 01:53
  • 1
Trump lost his temper and snapped at Rutte over NATO's inaction on Iran (Politico, USA)
  • 13.04 01:38
  • 1
The ice has broken, or a naughty pet from the Baltic States
  • 12.04 19:45
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Пока не возьмем на абордаж, не успокоятся». Запад готовит тотальную морскую блокаду России"
  • 12.04 07:58
  • 1
Что необходимо самолетам 5 и 6-го поколений без учета малозаметности. И какие страны в этом впереди.
  • 12.04 02:38
  • 0
Каковы перспективы боевой авиации без "малозаметности".
  • 12.04 02:08
  • 1
Комментарий к "США возвращаются к авиации 4 поколения. Почему? Разбираемся в проблеме"
  • 11.04 20:03
  • 2
The ships went: the frigate Admiral Grigorovich took two of our tankers through the English Channel
  • 11.04 19:15
  • 0
Комментарий к "Алжирский Су-57 впервые показали на качественном снимке"
  • 10.04 19:59
  • 0
Комментарий к "Ад разверзся: Зеленский взмолился о пощаде. Русские только вошли во вкус"
  • 10.04 18:49
  • 1
The structural collapse of NATO is the result of separation from reality (The Spectator, UK)