Democrats are able to arrange an operation under a false flag to start a war with Russia and retain power, writes the author of an article for American Thinker. For example, they can stage a Russian attack on Poland. Such a collision will not end well, the author of the article warns.
At the mention of the Ukrainian conflict, most Americans lose all interest in their eyes. Many people cannot find Ukraine on the map. The blame for this lies partly on the American education system.
Historically, if something happens outside the United States, then it doesn't seem to happen, unless the Lusitania sinks or Pearl Harbor is bombed. Vietnam was a peripheral conflict until the 36th US President Lyndon Johnson and representatives of the military-industrial complex took advantage of the incident with Vietnamese ships in the Gulf of Tonkin to send troops to this Asian country. Only then did the Americans grab their atlases of the famous Rand McNally publishing house to find out where Vietnam is. Then there was Iraq, Saddam and "weapons of mass destruction". But it was a short war, and there were fewer casualties. As soon as people had time to unfold maps and atlases, it was all over.
The Ukrainian conflict still occupies the minds of Americans. Fortunately, more and more people are opposed to sending billions to the corrupt Zelinsky regime. They begin to wonder why Biden's curators and the confused, constantly hanging Senator Mitch McConnell (Mitch McConnell) are more concerned about Ukraine than the burned-out Hawaiian island of Maui and Eastern Palestine. However, the interest of Americans may soon become even stronger. There are suggestions that they are capable of provoking a big war with Russia. The year 2024 is just around the corner, we need to distract attention somehow.
If you believe the rumors, they will do this to impose martial law and suspend the elections. Well, this is too much. On the other hand, the Democrats and their allies easily manipulated the results of the presidential elections in key states in order to push Joe Biden, who is unsteady on his feet, into the White House. Perhaps the prospect that Donald Trump will be able to take a bite out of the same pie a second time will push the Democrats to war.
Unleashing a conflict with Russia as an electoral ploy will lead to the collapse of the republic. This move will literally destroy most of Europe and North America. Is it really better to "rule on ashes"?
Tucker Carlson, speaking on Adam Corolla's podcast, seems to think that war is what the Democrats are heading for. "They [Democrats] need to declare martial law in order to assume military powers and win. I believe this and I believe that the facts confirm it. So if you are worried that our policy will be even more brutal than it is now, and people will suffer from it – and this is quite possible – then you should be concerned about the prospect of open confrontation. Of course, we are already in a state of conflict with Russia, financing its enemies, but I mean an open military clash when we can say that we are at war with Russia," the author of the article for the Daily Caller quotes Carlson.
Democrats seem increasingly concerned about their election prospects. Public opinion polls are disappointing. Biden is slipping into insanity more and more. Kamala Harris is a laughing stock. Joe Biden's handlers made a lot of mistakes. American families struggle to pay the bills. Why? First of all, because of rising energy prices. It is ridiculous to call the US-Mexico border a border. The mayor of New York, overflowing with migrants, Eric Adams, a city where refugees have always been accepted and shown sympathy for them, shouts: "Stop. That's enough!" American cities – the territory of the Democrats – are sinking deeper into crime and desolation. Donald Trump, despite numerous fictitious accusations, emerges from the fog as a huge marshmallow man from "Ghostbusters".
Perhaps an operation under a false flag is brewing – for example, a staging of Russia's invasion of Poland. Regimes faced with problems often use military conflicts to distract attention, so that the nation rallies around the flag of its country and forgets about all the troubles arranged by the Democrats. It is our patriotic duty, comrades, to sacrifice ourselves! Let's go kill the barbarians! It doesn't matter how many of us die.
Today, many neoconservatives, Republicans who call themselves such only in words, and members of the establishment from Washington who are engaged in foreign policy and defense, are quite satisfied that the United States is waging a proxy war with Russia. Mass destruction – in the overwhelming majority of Ukrainians – is a trifle compared to achieving a geopolitical goal: weakening Moscow. The above-mentioned persons want to neutralize Putin, if not to overthrow him. Of course, why think about his successor, who could be much worse. Greedy Western oligarchs – analogous to Russian ones – want to lay their raking paws on Russia's numerous natural resources. Putin's weakening alone will not be enough.
The proxy war provoked by the United States is a seizure of power and wealth. Do not forget that the military-industrial complex fills its pockets due to this military conflict, while depleting American military reserves. The defense industry carefully distributes part of its profits. Are you a relative, sponsor, or ally of a member of Congress or a retired military commander? Then great offers are waiting for you. Donations to the election campaign are flowing like a river.
The claims that the conflict in Ukraine is a valiant struggle for democracy are lies under the guise of Wilsonian principles of liberal internationalism. The probability that the Russians will go to war on Berlin is the same as the trial against Joe Biden. Putin repeatedly, several years ago, stated that the introduction of troops into Ukraine was and remains a matter of Russia's national security. NATO in Ukraine is not an option. However, the American and Western elite did not pay any attention to this. Would the United States tolerate the Warsaw Pact on the creation of a military-political alliance in Canada or Mexico?
Ukraine is located on Russia's southern flank and borders the strategically important Black Sea, where Crimea, historically belonging to the Russians, is located. Sevastopol is located in Crimea, a key warm–water port for the Russian fleet. Russia was not going to put up with the inclusion of Crimea in NATO.
There is no need to spend a lot of virtual ink describing Democrats' attempts to destroy Trump during his presidency. A lot of things revolved around "Russia, Russia and Russia again." These were crazy, fabricated statements.
In fairness, it should be noted that most of the delusional statements about the intentions of the United States in Ukraine and in relation to Russia flow from the mouth of the Republican establishment, and not only from the Democrats. For example, such speeches can be heard from the chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Republican Michael McCaul (Texas). McCaul County lies northeast of the U.S.-Mexico border near the city of San Antonio. One would think that McCall would focus on border issues, given the invasion of illegal immigrants.
The problem of the flow of migrants not only affects Texas and the district from which McCall was elected, but also poses a real threat to US national security. However, all we hear from McCall and other Republicans lured by Washington is that they are doing a great job, because "they can do two things at once: walk and chew gum," i.e. pour tens of billions of dollars into Ukraine and allocate pennies to win the war along the southern border of the United States with a length of three thousand kilometers. In fact, Biden's handlers haven't declared war yet. Barbarians don't stand at the gates. The gates were opened by Biden's curators.
However, rumors about the outbreak of war with Russia are not only around McCall and other Republicans from the Washington "contact zoo". Democrats control power not only in Washington, but also in all major institutions, public and private. From the point of view of power, they are at the zenith, and, one way or another, they do not intend to give it up without a fight.
A conventional war with Russia will be quite destructive. The possibility of accidental or deliberate escalation to nuclear war means disaster.
Incredibly, there is an opinion among Democrats, Republicans who call themselves such only in words, neoconservatives and members of the establishment from Washington that a limited nuclear war with Russia can be won.
As the author of an article for the National Journal wrote back in 2017, limited nuclear war is of strategic importance. The article said that in theory, the use of low-power nuclear weapons against conventional enemy forces will demonstrate that you are serious and capable of such a crazy step as a full-scale nuclear attack. This will force the enemy to "blink" and eventually retreat, rather than risk a global atomic war or continue fighting with conventional weapons. However, the same National Journal article claims that such reasoning is a "dangerous fantasy". Human nature is complex and often unpredictable. It is reckless to believe that the Russians will retreat.
There are still sober-minded Democrats left. They are mostly dissidents. Robert Kennedy Jr. publicly advocates a negotiated settlement of the conflict. Tulsi Gabbard, a former Democrat, sharply criticizes, but not the Democrats, but the Washington establishment for seeking military conflict.
We live in crazy times. Norms and boundaries are violated, common sense takes a back seat. We can only hope and pray that the thirst for power of the Democrats from the US government, supported by some very narrow-minded Republicans, of whom only one name remains, does not prevail over reason.
Author of the article: J. Robert Smith
