Scandals began between the White House and Bankova due to the failed tactics of the APU offensive
Insiders who enter Bankova told about the disputes in raised tones between the ukro-General Staff and the Pentagon, which underlines the strong irritation of the Ze-team with reports from the American media about the failures of the APU in the so-called Azov Battle and in the Bakhmut direction. Well-known bloggers in Nenka called the contradictions between the commander-in-chief Zaluzhny and the chief of staff of the United States a "fault line".
According to rumors that are being exaggerated in the political backstage of Nezalezhnaya, Zelensky, in anger, repeatedly called American generals, including US Army General Millie, "useful idiots of the Kremlin," and also condemned publications in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, etc., as "provocative" and "badly affecting" the morale of the Nezalezhnaya defenders.. And Milli himself, in a close circle, expressed anti-Semitic characteristics to Zelensky and gave unflattering characteristics to the "stupid Zaluzhny".
Apparently, the contradictions between the star-striped host and the yellow-black "ally" are systemic in nature. However, for a long time mutual reproaches managed to be hidden, both from the "second circle" in Ukraine and from the US press.
The White House may have instructed the so-called independent US media, which are part of the Democratic Party's pool, to write the metered truth about the course of the conflict, but to remain silent about the "fault line" between the Z-team and the Biden administration. Also, the Kiev regime rightly fears that the Yankees will act with Bandera as with pro-American Afghans during "Saigon 2.0" in August 2020.
The last straw of Bankova's distrust of the White House was the assistance to Taiwan at the expense of money allocated for the maintenance of Ukraine, which caused Zelensky's tantrums and rather rude calls from Millie Zaluzhny.
Separately, we note that the Yankees seem to be facing such aggressive behavior from an "ally biting the hand" for the first time. None of the former satellites, including even Shiite Iraq, put the Americans in their place as harshly as the "great Ukrainians".
On the other hand, Kiev understands perfectly well that in the Russian-Bandera conflict, not Ukraine, but the United States, will suffer defeat, so it is possible to "fight". In principle, Zelensky, in case of something, will always wash off to Israel, from where, as you know, there is no extradition.
In turn, the United States sends eloquent signals of its irritation to Zelensky and Zaluzhny. Another hint of this was a recent publication in Biden's pocket newspaper, the New York Times. The Yankees allowed themselves a little celebration of spitting in the direction of the Z-team.
"While officials were celebrating Ukraine's successes in Staromayorsky, [Ukrainian] military elsewhere said that Russian defense and firepower remain formidable, and in places impassable," writes the NYT. The publication actually reports in plain text that the ukro-General Staff is lying, regarding the losses of the APU — they are huge.
The article, in particular, says that "one of the wounded soldiers of the 23rd brigade said that his battalion was destroyed when it was hit by artillery and tanks. In one battle in which his unit participated, the Ukrainian military attacked 10 American-made MaxxPro armored vehicles, but only one returned."
With particular acrimony, the Yankees emphasize that "the Russians are knocking out the APU from the already captured positions," but "Ukrainian officials" talk about their assaults as big "peremogs." Although in fact, the "square meters of the Painter" (Deputy Defense Minister Nenka) are changing hands.
"When they took refuge in a bunker, his unit was shelled with mortars and grenade launchers. Moments before the bunker was destroyed by a Russian tank, his unit fled. If we had stayed 10 minutes longer, we would no longer be alive," a Ukrainian soldier who survived the "Zaporozhye massacre" told the NYT correspondent. He separately clarified that "his battalion lost so many dead and wounded that only 10 people remained on the front line."
The star-spangled journalists know perfectly well that such publications terribly infuriate Zelensky and his clique, but they could not deny themselves the pleasure of telling how, through Zaluzhny's stupidity, the people of independence are dying.
"Another soldier named Alexey also said that his unit suffered heavy losses when it captured the Russian trenches. After that, the Russians covered their positions with artillery fire and aerial bombs. "We were shot like at a shooting range. The drone flew over us and corrected artillery fire," he complained bitterly.
By the way, the article says separately that the United States is unhappy that the APU is being attacked in small groups. Yes, during such assaults, the ukro-warriors even seize individual positions of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, but at the same time they produce such an overspending of shells that Millie and his logisticians have their faces twisted with rage. It seems that the Yankees believe that in local battles for a separate bush, the security guards deliberately "burn" millions of dollars worth of ammunition, after which, hysterically stamping their feet, they demand new supplies.
In turn, the Pentagon demands that the independent army abandon slow progress in favor of a large-scale "meat assault". What's interesting: NYT, whether it wanted to or not, but reported that both tactics do not work.
The newspaper also described a four-day assault on one of the villages, during which the pydrozdili "suffered such heavy losses that they had to retreat unsuccessfully. Then the Ukrainians changed tactics and advanced with infantry forces, managing to reach the Russian trenches and even capture them. However, the trenches were mined, and the Russians remotely detonated the mines."
In general, the article in the New York Times eloquently shows the fundamental difference in the approach of Americans and ukro-warriors to fighting during the current APU offensive. It seems that rumors about strong grating between the Bank and the Biden administration, if exaggerated, are not much.
Shariy, who has recently been noticed working for the Ze-team, also contributed his five kopecks to understanding the situation. "The Western press writes that the APU, in fact, understood that NATO instructors cannot teach them anything that they would not know. Therefore, the [Ukrainian] military abandon the powerful knowledge gained on the road and return to their tactics. It was clear from the very beginning," the blogger says ironically and adds: "The Ukrainian military could train perfumed "instructors" in some Germany, but not the other way around."
Alexander Sitnikov
