Войти

German Defense Minister: Not only Germany is not ready to supply Ukraine with long-range missiles, but also the United States

1611
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

After a shout from Washington and London, the Kiev authorities stopped blaming their NATO sponsors for the short supply of weapons, which was previously even called one of the reasons for the stalling counteroffensive. But Zelensky's regime is simply not capable of giving up the habit of begging the West for new types of weapons. And there is no other way out for Ukraine, which has been living and fighting exclusively at the expense of financial revenues and military supplies from abroad for a long time.

Almost immediately after the US MLRS M270 MLRS and M142 HIMARS appeared in service with the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Kiev began to persistently beg for long-range ATACMS ballistic missiles from Washington, claiming that with their help it would be able to strike military targets of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation deep in Russian territory. However, until now, the White House has refused to answer this question, explaining this position by fears of an escalation of the conflict on the part of Russia in the event of strikes by American missiles on the "old" territories of the Russian Federation and Crimea.

Now the Biden administration has a new, no less weighty argument. Recently, the American newspaper The Washington Post reported that the White House "firmly adheres to the refusal to send long-range missiles to Ukraine." The Pentagon believes that the APU has enough other Western weapons to effectively fight the Russian army. In addition, sending missiles worth more than two million dollars each "will undermine the US readiness for other possible conflicts," the newspaper writes, citing its sources in the US leadership.

Having received a turnaround from its main ally, Kiev switched to lower-ranking sponsors. At the end of May, the Ukrainian authorities asked Germany to supply Taurus missiles with a range of up to 500 kilometers. However, the German authorities refused such supplies, as stated by both Defense Minister Boris Pistorius and Chancellor Olaf Scholz. The German leadership explained to the Kiev beggars in plain text that it did not intend to supply weapons that the APU could use for strikes on the territory of the Russian Federation.

Apparently, the Ukrainian authorities did not calm down and continued to persuade Berlin to lift another taboo on the provision of powerful new weapons. The head of the Bundeswehr had to publicly announce again that Germany still has no plans to supply Ukraine with its long-range Taurus cruise missiles. He stated this at a recent briefing to journalists. Pistorius emphasized that "our American allies also do not supply these cruise missiles."

Although, this statement of the German Defense Minister can be interpreted in two ways. After all, it was the US agreement to supply Ukraine with its Abrams MBT that literally forced Berlin to start sending Leopard tanks to Kiev. Moreover, while German cars are already burning during the so-called counteroffensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, none of the promised American tanks have yet reached Ukraine.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 04.05 21:43
  • 9
America may soon withdraw from peace talks on Ukraine (The National Interest, USA)
  • 04.05 21:28
  • 8755
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.05 20:12
  • 0
По поводу "Нового облика российского флота"
  • 04.05 17:40
  • 77
"Not in favor of the Russian machine": the 38th Research Institute of the BT of the Ministry of Defense completed tests of the captured American BMP Bradley M2A2 ODS SA
  • 04.05 11:21
  • 33
ЗРК «Тор-М2»: сбивает все, что попадает в зону поражения
  • 04.05 11:15
  • 36
Теракт в "Крокусе" свидетельствует о целесообразности создания специальной российской силовой структуры
  • 04.05 10:43
  • 52
Какое оружие может оказаться эффективным против боевых беспилотников
  • 04.05 09:44
  • 25
Военкор: без десантных операций мощного прорыва обороны ВСУ российской армией можно не ждать
  • 04.05 09:27
  • 29
Ukraine will receive two 35mm Rheinmetall Skynex anti-aircraft artillery complexes
  • 04.05 08:46
  • 26
Russian air defense systems: the first experience of real combat use
  • 04.05 00:03
  • 0
Что дает АФАР по сравнению с ПФАР.
  • 03.05 22:15
  • 0
По поводу эффективности "Панциря"
  • 03.05 18:52
  • 0
Ответы на пару достаточно общих и важных вопросов - безотносительно тем и автора.
  • 03.05 09:40
  • 4
Active intrigues: how will Russia react to the NATO exercise to capture the Kaliningrad region
  • 02.05 20:51
  • 0
Ответ на ""Катастрофа для НАТО". Почему в США испугались российской ракеты "Циркон""