Войти

The descent of a pair of UMPK FAB-500M62 with Su-34 on the positions of the APU for the first time got into the frame

3091
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

The network has published footage showing, for the first time at close range, the combat use of FAB-500M-62 planning bombs equipped with universal planning and correction modules (UMPC) by the crew of the Su-34 aircraft. The shooting angle allows you to see in detail the device of the planning module in the unfolded state.

Immediately after the descent from the suspension units, the fabs with the UMPC adjust their course and continue flying along the planning trajectory, after which they are directed to the target using the data of the inertial navigation system and the satellite system module.

Equipped with UMPC modules, aerial bombs are capable not only of reaching drop ranges of up to 60-70 kilometers with a small deviation from the target, but also of skirting the positional areas of enemy air defense systems.

According to the Western press, the Russian army, with the help of electronic warfare, effectively silences the American "smart" JDAM bombs supplied by the United States to the Kiev regime.

According to experts, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation have automated jamming stations R-330ZH "Resident", capable of disrupting the operation of GPS and satellite communications in the bands used by JDAM within a radius of about 30 kilometers. Russian electronic warfare systems are also capable of intercepting encrypted signals, making changes to them, and then retransmitting them, thereby significantly reducing the accuracy of the hit.

Image source: topwar.ru

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Продукция
Компании
Проекты
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 04:13
  • 0
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"