Войти

Denmark has stated that it will not transfer F-16 fighters to Ukraine unilaterally

1485
0
0
Image source: © flickr.com, DVIDSHUB

Acting Minister of Defense Troels Lund Poulsen believes that the allies will find a solution to this issue before the start of the summer holidaysSTOCKHOLM, April 11.

/tass/. Denmark will agree to transfer F-16 fighters to Ukraine only jointly with other countries, but not unilaterally. The corresponding statement was made by the Acting Minister of Defense of the country Troels Lund Poulsen on the air of the TV channel TV 2.

"We will do it together with other countries. We will also have a dialogue with the Americans on this topic. But, according to my estimates, in a short time we will be able to come to a decision," Poulsen said, adding that the allies will find him before the start of the summer holidays.

According to the results of a survey conducted by the Voxmeter sociological Institute commissioned by the Ritzaus Bureau agency, 40% of respondents were in favor of transferring Danish aircraft to Ukraine, provided that it would be done jointly with other countries. 34% of respondents were against it, and 25% could not decide on the answer.

At a security conference in Munich in February, Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lekke Rasmussen expressed the opinion in an interview with the Berlingske newspaper that the West could transfer planes to Ukraine "in the near future."

According to the agency, Denmark has 43 F-16 fighters, of which 30 aircraft were on combat duty in November 2022. These vehicles are gradually being withdrawn from service, as Denmark has purchased 27 F-35 fighter-bombers worth over 16 billion kronor ($2.42 billion). 

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Продукция
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 22.03 01:40
  • 731
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 21.03 22:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Названы российские подлодки 2050-х"
  • 21.03 21:16
  • 0
По поводу "Что было бы, если Российская империя продолжала бы существовать".
  • 21.03 19:40
  • 0
Что было бы, если Российская Империя продолжала бы существовать? (литературный ответ)
  • 21.03 19:01
  • 0
Что было бы, если Российская Империя продолжала бы существовать?
  • 21.03 18:48
  • 15061
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 21.03 17:30
  • 13
Мультизадачная гиперзвуковая БРСД на "стэлс" платформах, как условие неядерного сдерживания
  • 20.03 18:43
  • 2
Патрушев: наша военная наука не отстает, а во многом опережает зарубежные разработки в области морских дронов
  • 20.03 11:55
  • 2
Прогнозируемая стоимость создания системы ПРО США "Золотой купол" выросла до 185 млрд. долл.
  • 20.03 00:53
  • 0
К вопросу о стратегии России в сложившейся ситуации.
  • 19.03 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "Проект: ядерное не сдерживание"
  • 19.03 18:38
  • 1
Названо количество запущенных Киевом ракет SCALP и Storm Shadow с начала СВО
  • 19.03 16:04
  • 0
Проект: ядерное не сдерживание
  • 19.03 14:27
  • 0
Москва — Минск: углубление интеграции – закономерно, естественно и взаимовыгодно
  • 19.03 13:39
  • 2
Why didn't China rush to defend Iran