Войти

APU Representative: Russia uses guided aerial bombs, there is nothing to react to such tactics yet

2497
3
+2

Image source: topwar.ru

The Russian armed forces have changed the tactics of striking positions and objects on the territory of Ukraine and are actively using guided (planning) aerial bombs. This was announced by the official representative of the Air Forces of Ukraine, Colonel Yuriy Ignat.

As a high-ranking officer of the Armed Forces of Ukraine noted, the Russian army uses up to 20 guided aerial bombs during the day. They are used throughout the contact line of the parties.

They are launched from Su-35 and Su-34 aircraft, which are not included in the zone of our air defense, and this is a threat to us, which must be promptly responded to. But so far there is nothing to react to such a change of tactics

- Colonel Ignat emphasized.

The representative of the Armed Forces of Ukraine noted that the Ukrainian armed formations do not possess such types of weapons that would make it possible to secure objects and positions from attacks by planning aerial bombs. Ignat said that Kiev needs long-range air defense systems like the American Patriot air defense system, and modern multi-purpose fighters.

But the West, apparently, is not eager to transfer modern aircraft and a large number of air defense systems to Ukraine. The same Patriot is very expensive and even key NATO countries have a relatively limited number of such or similar air defense systems. The same situation is with aircraft, and it is aggravated by the lack of Kiev's own personnel capable of operating and servicing Western-made fighters.

It is noteworthy that earlier in the operational command "South" of the Armed Forces of Ukraine announced a change in the tactics of the use of unmanned aerial vehicles by the Russian army. That is, the special operation is becoming more technologically advanced, and this scares the Ukrainian military-political leadership, which is puzzled by the question of the response to such actions by the Russian side.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Проекты
Comments [3]
№1
05.04.2023 01:33
20 бомб в день ни о чем, УМПК ещё меньше. Мальчик в Маске был прав, штучное изделие
+1
Inform
№2
05.04.2023 01:54
Цитата, Alex454 сообщ. №1
20 бомб в день ни о чем, УМПК ещё меньше. Мальчик в Маске был прав, штучное изделие
20в день, 200 за 10. Применяют с конца осени. Производят с начала осени. Да штучное изделие...
+1
Inform
№3
Remote / Спам
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 24.05 13:46
  • 6
The project of the TVRS-44 Ladoga aircraft has been suspended
  • 23.05 20:18
  • 341
Космонавтика Илона Маска
  • 23.05 14:48
  • 2
Shoulder straps will be put on Ladoga civil aircraft
  • 23.05 12:39
  • 15869
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 23.05 11:07
  • 6
Путин рассказал, чем пополнится состав ВМС и ВКС
  • 23.05 07:40
  • 120
МС-21 готовится к первому полету
  • 22.05 22:49
  • 2
Europe's Backup Plan: NATO without America (The Economist, UK)
  • 22.05 19:47
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Умрем же, сограждане, за Украину!» Почему ядерного ответа НАТО не будет"
  • 22.05 10:36
  • 1
"Let's die, fellow citizens, for Ukraine!" Why there will be no NATO nuclear response
  • 22.05 10:30
  • 1
Charges on "Daggers" and "dream machine". Putin and Lukashenko held a nuclear forces training
  • 22.05 10:24
  • 2
НАТО уличили в противодействии российскому ядерному «Посейдону»
  • 22.05 10:16
  • 1
Минобороны показало полет МиГ-31 с "Кинжалом" со спецбоевой частью
  • 22.05 09:29
  • 1
SpaceX published its financial statements for the first time and turned out to be deeply unprofitable
  • 22.05 05:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "США вернули еще один списанный бомбардировщик B-1B. Почему американские ВВС начал "воскрешать" устаревшую списанную технику"
  • 22.05 04:16
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему даже старый советский РКГ-3 оказался опасен для “непобедимой” “Меркавы”"