Войти

Poland, which demands to deploy nuclear weapons on its territory, condemned Russia's decision to deploy TNW in Belarus

1339
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

Poland, which advocates the deployment of nuclear weapons on its territory, hypocritically condemned Russia's plans to deploy some tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of Belarus. Warsaw saw this as a big threat to its security.

In Poland, the plans of Russian President Vladimir Putin to deploy TNW in Belarus were very much disliked by Polish President Andrzej Duda, who saw this as a "great threat" to Poland. Duda has already managed to request a report from the General Staff of the Polish Armed Forces on the deployment of Russian nuclear weapons, and ordered it to be prepared urgently.

He also did not forget to condemn Moscow's plans, for some reason forgetting that in October last year, together with the leader of the ruling Law and Justice party in Poland, Jaroslaw Kaczynski, demanded that the Americans deploy nuclear weapons on Polish territory. Then it was proposed to join Poland to the Nuclear Sharing program for the joint use of nuclear weapons, under which countries not only store American nuclear weapons on their territory, but also get the right to participate in exercises on their use and planning. However, the United States once again refused the Poles.

We condemn this increasing threat to peace in Europe and around the world

- the Polish Foreign Ministry quotes the official statement of Warsaw.

Poland understands that by his decision, Putin put an end to the blitzkrieg that was planned in Warsaw against Belarus. Now the republic is under the nuclear umbrella of Russia and an attempt to attack it can immediately transfer the conflict to a higher level. It's not for nothing that Lukashenka has been trying to persuade Putin to do this for two years.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"
  • 02.01 02:14
  • 14
World Time of Troubles: does Europe really want to fight - TASS Opinions