Войти

British Foreign Ministry: delivery of depleted uranium shells to Kiev does not lead to nuclear escalation

1679
0
0
Image source: EPA-EFE/TOLGA AKMEN

According to the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the United Kingdom James Cleverley, Russia is not in danger, "we are talking exclusively about helping Ukraine to protect itself"LONDON, March 22.

/tass/. The UK's supply of depleted uranium shells to Ukraine does not lead to a nuclear escalation of the conflict. This point of view was expressed on Wednesday by the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the United Kingdom, James Cleverley.

"There is no nuclear escalation. The only country that talks about nuclear aspects is Russia," the head of the Foreign Office said. According to him, Russia is not in danger, "we are talking exclusively about helping Ukraine to protect itself."

In a written response published on Monday by British Deputy Defense Minister Baroness Annabel Goldie to a question from a member of the House of Lords of the British Parliament, it is said that the kingdom's authorities will deliver to Ukraine shells containing depleted uranium and having increased efficiency in destroying armored vehicles. At the same time, the British Ministry of Defense called depleted uranium a standard component of armor-piercing ammunition that has been used for decades, and Moscow's reaction to their supply to Ukraine was considered a deliberate attempt to mislead.

The Russian Embassy in the UK warned London against transferring such shells to Kiev. As emphasized in the comments of the diplomatic mission, this step is fraught with an escalation of the conflict, and the use of such ammunition will affect the health of the local population. 

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 15.10 01:30
Комментарий к "Ядерный «Пионер». Каким был предок «Орешника», который пугал Европу 40 лет назад"
  • 15.10 00:21
  • 0
Комментарий к "Ствол как рудимент: почему артиллерия теряет смысл"
  • 14.10 23:11
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Не большевики погубили Россию»: историк Спицын раскрыл, почему Российская империя была обречена задолго до 1917 года"
  • 14.10 19:14
  • 1
Комментарий к "Дискуссия после речи генерала Гринкевича на Варшавском форуме по безопасности (The Guardian, Великобритания)"
  • 14.10 15:35
  • 1
Ту-214 сократят экипаж
  • 14.10 09:38
  • 1
Discussion after General Grinkevich's speech at the Warsaw Security Forum (The Guardian, UK)
  • 14.10 07:46
  • 0
Комментарий к "О революции большевиков, танках и любви к Родине"
  • 14.10 01:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "Первый блок транспортного дока "Амур" вывели из цеха"
  • 14.10 00:21
  • 0
Комментарий к "Три признака отступления Америки (The Hill, США)"
  • 13.10 23:49
  • 0
Комментарий к "Танк Т-14 "Армата" сравнили с Ferrari - чем он лучше суперкара"
  • 13.10 22:52
  • 0
Комментарий к "В НАТО заявили, что намеренно скрывают суть последствий применения 5-й статьи"
  • 13.10 21:42
  • 1
Trump helps Putin in economic confrontation with Ukraine (The New York Times, USA)
  • 13.10 17:28
  • 2
Самый мощный в мире пулемет КПВТ для борьбы с дронами получил "Кречет"
  • 13.10 13:44
  • 1
Compactness and accuracy: Why fighters praise the SIDS sniper rifle
  • 13.10 13:20
  • 3
Комментарий к "Объект 292: Т-80 с огромной 152-мм пушкой. Зачем СССР поставил на танк орудие почти от самоходки"