Войти

Breaking Defense: The Pentagon does not rule out the transfer of M1 Abrams tanks to Ukraine from long-term storage

1462
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

Ukraine may receive American M1 Abrams tanks much earlier than previously announced. The Pentagon has not yet made a final decision on the delivery option, Breaking Defense reports, citing a senior official of the US State Department.

The United States has not yet decided which tanks to send to Ukraine - new ones that will still need to be produced, or old ones that are in storage. There is no final decision, although about a month has passed since the announcement of the potential supply of heavy armored vehicles to Ukraine.

According to First Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Military and Political Affairs Stanley Brown, it was initially assumed that 31 M1A2 Abrams tanks for the Ukrainian army would be produced under the new contract. Then it was proposed to supply tanks with storage, so as not to wait for a long time. Now even the option of a combined delivery is being discussed, in which half of the tanks will be new, and the other half will be "not very". Such a step will potentially accelerate the delivery of tanks to Kiev.

Potentially, they can be a combination of built and discontinued (...) We have Abrams in storage. We have different versions of Abrams, some older (...) And I do not know which of them Ukraine will eventually receive

- the official said.

Meanwhile, not all US military support the transfer of Abrams tanks to Ukraine, there are also opponents of this decision. The main reasons why Kiev should not receive American tanks - they may fall into the hands of the Russian military, as well as the complexity of operation. It is stated that Ukraine does not have a specialized base for servicing American tanks, and this makes them, in fact, disposable.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Продукция
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 21.03 22:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Названы российские подлодки 2050-х"
  • 21.03 21:16
  • 0
По поводу "Что было бы, если Российская империя продолжала бы существовать".
  • 21.03 19:40
  • 0
Что было бы, если Российская Империя продолжала бы существовать? (литературный ответ)
  • 21.03 19:01
  • 0
Что было бы, если Российская Империя продолжала бы существовать?
  • 21.03 18:48
  • 15061
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 21.03 17:30
  • 13
Мультизадачная гиперзвуковая БРСД на "стэлс" платформах, как условие неядерного сдерживания
  • 21.03 15:59
  • 730
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 20.03 18:43
  • 2
Патрушев: наша военная наука не отстает, а во многом опережает зарубежные разработки в области морских дронов
  • 20.03 11:55
  • 2
Прогнозируемая стоимость создания системы ПРО США "Золотой купол" выросла до 185 млрд. долл.
  • 20.03 00:53
  • 0
К вопросу о стратегии России в сложившейся ситуации.
  • 19.03 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "Проект: ядерное не сдерживание"
  • 19.03 18:38
  • 1
Названо количество запущенных Киевом ракет SCALP и Storm Shadow с начала СВО
  • 19.03 16:04
  • 0
Проект: ядерное не сдерживание
  • 19.03 14:27
  • 0
Москва — Минск: углубление интеграции – закономерно, естественно и взаимовыгодно
  • 19.03 13:39
  • 2
Why didn't China rush to defend Iran