Войти

The British Defense Minister named the main reason for the refusal to transfer the Royal Air Force fighters to Ukraine

1401
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

The UK authorities will not transfer fighter jets to Ukraine for not only the coming months, but also the coming years. This was stated in an interview with the British press by the Minister of Defense of the United Kingdom, Ben Wallace.

According to the head of the British military department, it is necessary to plan not only military support for Ukraine at the present time, but also long-term assistance to the Kiev regime. However, we are not talking about the transfer of fighters, according to Wallace.

The main problem, as follows from the statement of the head of the British military department, is the impossibility of operation and maintenance of Western combat aircraft by Ukrainian servicemen without special training.

At the same time, it is not possible to train military pilots or aviation engineers, specialists in missile weapons, communications and surveillance equipment in courses of several weeks or even months.

Wallace stressed that if the British government decides to transfer fighter jets to Ukraine, London will have to provide at least 200 Royal Air Force servicemen to the Kiev regime.

It is clear that the British authorities will not take such a step: firstly, it will already be a direct confrontation between London and Russia, and secondly, it is not a fact that the British servicemen themselves will agree with this. And the British society will disapprove of the losses of the British military personnel.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 19.03 03:14
  • 1
ЦАМТО: союзники США заняли выжидательную позицию после призыва Трампа отправить корабли в Персидский залив
  • 19.03 01:57
  • 685
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 19.03 01:30
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США назвали оружие для удара по кораблям Китая"
  • 19.03 00:39
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США назвали Су-57 угрозой для F-35"
  • 19.03 00:36
  • 15034
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 18.03 11:10
  • 2
Во Франции обеспокоились российскими ракетами
  • 18.03 10:55
  • 1
США потеряли около 12 БЛА MQ-9 Reaper в ходе вооруженного конфликта с Ираном
  • 18.03 10:50
  • 1
The engineer received three years for passing on the secrets of Varshavyanka
  • 18.03 01:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "Полковник перечислил самое мощное оружие России в зоне СВО"
  • 17.03 21:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "НАТО усиливает патрулирование в Арктике. Главная цель — обнаружить российские подлодки, пока они не ушли на глубину (Business Insider, Германия)"
  • 17.03 21:00
  • 0
Комментарий к "Может ли НАТО разместить ядерное оружие в Финляндии? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 17.03 19:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "США ударом ATACMS затопили российскую «Варшавянку» в Иране"
  • 17.03 18:49
  • 2
США ударом ATACMS затопили российскую «Варшавянку» в Иране
  • 17.03 18:31
  • 1
Why didn't China rush to defend Iran
  • 17.03 17:04
  • 0
Польша между двух огней