Войти

Reuters: Europe's spending to fight the energy crisis is approaching 800 billion euros

1258
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

Despite the fact that gas prices in the EU continue to decline (today the March futures quotes are below the $ 600 mark per thousand cubic meters), European countries have already suffered enormous losses in the course of fighting the energy crisis.

According to Reuters, citing data provided by the Belgian Brueghel Institute, due to the rise in gas prices that began in the fall of 2021, European countries have already managed to spend about 800 billion on subsidizing households and enterprises. euro.

The article says that Germany was the most "affected" financially. Berlin spent about a third of the above amount on subsidies. In second place is the United Kingdom, which has allocated a little more than 100 billion from its budget. euro.

Recall that the situation with the gas shortage in Europe significantly worsened in the summer of this year, when supply disruptions from Russia began. Later, an "unknown party" committed sabotage on the SP-1 and SP-2 gas pipelines, which pushed gas quotes in Europe to record levels above 2 thousand dollars per cubic meter.

At the moment, the situation with the gas shortage in the EU has begun to stabilize thanks to American LNG supplies. Meanwhile, it is worth recalling that "blue fuel" from the United States is more than four times more expensive than Russian. Thus, it is obvious that the burden on the budget of European countries will continue this year.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 20.04 05:13
  • 8480
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 20.04 04:55
  • 1
О противостоянии ЗРС и ЛА
  • 20.04 01:10
  • 11
Военкор: без десантных операций мощного прорыва обороны ВСУ российской армией можно не ждать
  • 20.04 00:29
  • 0
Ответ на "Эксперт Коротченко: истребитель F-16 ВСУ могли сбить ЗРС С-300В4 или ЗРК "Бук""
  • 19.04 20:12
  • 0
Ответ на ""Откуда взялась третья ракета?" Как был сбит украинский F-16"
  • 19.04 12:49
  • 2
19FortyFive: США могут забыть о F-47, поскольку Китай строит один истребитель-«невидимку» за другим
  • 19.04 02:48
  • 1
О Ту-22Мn, -95М, -160, Су-34, и ПАК ДА
  • 19.04 01:05
  • 0
Ответ на "На Западе назвали украинские F-16 устаревшими"
  • 18.04 13:35
  • 2
The Ukrainian BMPT "Sentinel" based on the T-64BV turned out to be a stillborn project
  • 18.04 04:20
  • 4
Ответ на "Российский бомбардировщик Ту-160М: самое неожиданное возвращение (19FortyFive, США)"
  • 17.04 06:53
  • 1
В НАСА заявили о готовности модулей станции Gateway
  • 17.04 06:33
  • 0
Ответ на "Будет ли военно-морской флот России сотрудничать с Китаем, чтобы бросить вызов гегемонии США на море? (Tencent, Китай)"
  • 17.04 02:04
  • 0
Ответ на " Названа новая задача Су-35С"
  • 17.04 01:58
  • 1
Will the Russian Navy cooperate with China to challenge U.S. hegemony at sea? (Tencent, China)
  • 16.04 15:59
  • 1
The last of the Mohicans and the flying "Chinese": what disappoints the 6th generation of US aircraft