Войти

Anti-aircraft self-propelled guns "Shilka" can become real "death machines"

2581
0
0

Image Source: Photo: Bravery2004

ZSU-23-4 "Shilka" anti-aircraft self-propelled guns have been used for several decades to combat ground targets. In this capacity, they were used during the stay in Afghanistan of the Soviet 40th army, as well as during the Iran-Iraq War. Moreover, these combat vehicles served on both sides of the front.

The Syrian army received about four hundred such combat vehicles from the USSR and almost from the very beginning of the civil war, self-propelled guns began to be used for fire support.

Four 23 mm guns have a maximum firing range of 2000 m and easily cope with lightly armored targets such as armored personnel carriers, infantry fighting vehicles, cars and enemy manpower. The rate of fire is up to 1000 rounds per minute per barrel. Ammunition - 2000 shells.

Image Source: Photo: Bravery2004

The main drawback of these machines is relatively thin armor. However, the Syrian military independently improved the security characteristics. So, in the elite 4th armored Division, they were turned into real mobile fortresses - anti-cumulative grids, chains with steel balls and steel boxes with filler were mounted, radar stations that had become unnecessary were dismantled.

In another elite unit, the 105th Brigade of the Republican Guard of Syria, they also refined the "Shilka", but in a slightly different way. They began to install solid armored plates located at an angle in the front upper part of the hull, on the turret, sides and stern.

Image Source: Photo: Bravery2004

Image Source: Photo: Bravery2004

The experience of using such equipment has generally confirmed the effectiveness of both options and has significantly reduced the loss of personnel.

Attention! When using the materials of the Online publication "Bulletin of Mordovia News Agency" (Certificate of registration of Mass Media in the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Communications E # FS 77 – 49053), a REFERENCE to the source is mandatory.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Продукция
Проекты
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 01.08 20:46
Комментарий к "Танк Т-64 с автоматом заряжания убрал четвёртого члена экипажа — что это изменило в конструкции"
  • 01.08 19:13
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему гуманитарию так сложно найти общий язык с техническими специалистами? Я одна такая? Есть ли вообще решение?"
  • 01.08 18:25
  • 16349
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 01.08 06:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "Так какую же всё-таки роль сыграл Ленд-лиз"
  • 01.08 02:20
  • 0
Об эсминцах, раз уж пошел разговор о возобновлении их постройки в РФ
  • 01.08 00:27
  • 0
Комментарий к "Один стационарный С-200 закрывал площадь сорока дивизионов С-75"
  • 31.07 19:20
  • 0
Комментарий к "Модернизацию атомного подводного флота назвали важнейшей задачей для развития ВМФ"
  • 31.07 19:02
  • 2
Russia has announced its first destroyer program in 40 years. Urgently needed: Ocean-going warships (Military Watch Magazine, USA)
  • 31.07 18:51
  • 0
Комментарий к "Россия объявила о первой за 40 лет программе создания эсминцев. Срочно требуются: океанские боевые корабли (Military Watch Magazine, США)"
  • 31.07 18:09
  • 1
Госкомвоенпром: ОАО "АЛЕВКУРП" усовершенствовало оптико-электронную систему для ЗРК
  • 31.07 18:00
  • 1
Модернизацию атомного подводного флота назвали важнейшей задачей для развития ВМФ
  • 31.07 17:37
  • 1
Sea revenues: The Caspian Flotilla acquired its own aircraft
  • 31.07 17:18
  • 1
Минобороны: Россия обладает опытом создания масштабных группировок ПВО
  • 31.07 07:33
  • 0
Комментарий к "Чем же была более всего сильна промышленность Российской империи"
  • 31.07 05:53
  • 0
Комментарий к "Чего Европе ждать от задуманной США “НАТО 3.0”? (The Spectator, Великобритания)"