Войти

NATO forces have worked out the defense of the Suwalki corridor, taking into account the experience of the AFU's actions against the Russian army

1253
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

NATO forces conducted exercises to defend the Suwalki (Suwalki) corridor, a strategically important section of the Lithuanian-Polish border 64 km long, located between Belarus and the Kaliningrad region of Russia. This was reported by the Polish Defense Ministry.

Lithuania, Poland and the units of other NATO countries that joined them with a total of more than 2 thousand military personnel worked out the defense of the Suwalki corridor from superior enemy forces, which traditionally play the role of Russia and Belarus. At the same time, Polish Defense Minister Mariusz Blaszczak said, his own experience and the experience of the Ukrainian army's combat operations against Russian troops were used.

We know what methods Russia uses and what methods are effective against it (...) the trainings are conducted on the basis of their experience and observations of the battles in Ukraine

he added.

Image source: topwar.ru

In April of this year, after Russia launched a special military operation in Ukraine, Lithuania and Poland developed a joint defense plan for the Suwalki corridor, fearing that a joint grouping of Russia and Belarus would strike at the junction between the two countries to create a land corridor to the Kaliningrad region. At the same time, the Baltic states will be completely cut off from other countries of the alliance.

According to this plan, the combined Polish-Lithuanian grouping should hold out until the approach of the allies, primarily the armies of Latvia and Estonia, as well as NATO tactical groups stationed on the territory of the Baltic countries. According to preliminary calculations of NATO analysts, Poland and the Baltic States will be able to defend the Suwalki corridor with their existing forces from 36 to 60 hours, waiting for the approach of the main NATO forces.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 04:13
  • 0
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"