Войти

US press: Two-thirds of NATO countries are no longer able to provide military assistance to Ukraine

1512
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

The West is experiencing more and more problems with the supply of weapons and ammunition to Ukraine, to date, only a few countries have retained the ability to supply military assistance to the Zelensky regime. This is reported by The New York Times.

According to the American newspaper, two-thirds of NATO countries have almost completely exhausted their military potential and are no longer able to supply weapons and ammunition to Ukraine. However, the remaining one-third still has opportunities and they are not small. The publication refers to NATO representatives, who presented these calculations.

In general, 20 NATO countries have "blown away", and ten are ready to continue to supply the Kiev regime with weapons to confront Russia. Among the most "spent" are Poland and the three Baltic republics, i.e. the "Russophobic four", which is ready to do a lot for the sake of "victory" over Russia. And the main sponsors are still the USA, Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy and the Netherlands. These "pillars of democracy" still have enough strength and means to continue the war with Russia.

However, these countries also have problems. The thing is that the West was not actually ready for what is happening in Ukraine today. Most of all, the American army participated in the hostilities, but in fact it was fighting with partisans who did not have modern weapons. The same NATO recognized that the amount of artillery used in Ukraine is "staggering." In Afghanistan, the United States fired 300 shells a day and it was considered a lot, and the air was not even monitored there. One day in Ukraine can be counted for a month of fighting in Afghanistan, the alliance said.

Now NATO is sorely lacking precisely "consumables", i.e. ammunition, ATGM, MANPADS, etc., in general, everything that is needed on the battlefield. It takes time to replenish these reserves, and the West does not have it. Meanwhile, Kiev continues to demand more and more weapons.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 22.07 15:37
  • 1
Комментарий к "США создали дешевый Patriot"
  • 22.07 15:22
  • 2
Индонезия захотела построить космодром совместно с Россией
  • 22.07 14:14
  • 16325
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 22.07 06:07
  • 0
Комментарий к "Вот почему в танках СССР ставили автомат заряжания в корпус"
  • 22.07 03:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Ту-4: советская копия B-29"
  • 22.07 03:33
  • 1
Deceive flying: how Lightning drones learned to confuse the interceptors of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
  • 22.07 01:20
  • 1
Комментарий к "Какой танк лучше: M1 Abrams или Т-90. Сравнительный обзор"
  • 22.07 00:02
  • 0
Комментарий к "Станут ли европейцы воевать, если до этого дойдет? (The Economist, Великобритания)"
  • 21.07 20:17
  • 5
Комментарий к "Жуткий схематизм в теории прибавочной стоимости Маркса и ее научная несостоятельность."
  • 21.07 12:49
  • 1
Greetings to Odessa: Russia has begun to completely isolate Ukraine from the Black Sea
  • 21.07 05:46
  • 8
Пентагон впервые за 20 лет скрыл отчет о недостатках истребителей F-35
  • 21.07 03:48
  • 1
Российские порты прикрыли «Корветом»
  • 21.07 03:43
  • 1
США создали дешевый Patriot
  • 21.07 03:35
  • 1
Will the Europeans fight if it comes to that? (The Economist, UK)
  • 20.07 18:15
  • 0
Комментарий к "Какой танк лучше: Challenger 2 или Т-72. Сравнительный обзор (Часть 3)"