Войти

US press: Two-thirds of NATO countries are no longer able to provide military assistance to Ukraine

1394
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

The West is experiencing more and more problems with the supply of weapons and ammunition to Ukraine, to date, only a few countries have retained the ability to supply military assistance to the Zelensky regime. This is reported by The New York Times.

According to the American newspaper, two-thirds of NATO countries have almost completely exhausted their military potential and are no longer able to supply weapons and ammunition to Ukraine. However, the remaining one-third still has opportunities and they are not small. The publication refers to NATO representatives, who presented these calculations.

In general, 20 NATO countries have "blown away", and ten are ready to continue to supply the Kiev regime with weapons to confront Russia. Among the most "spent" are Poland and the three Baltic republics, i.e. the "Russophobic four", which is ready to do a lot for the sake of "victory" over Russia. And the main sponsors are still the USA, Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy and the Netherlands. These "pillars of democracy" still have enough strength and means to continue the war with Russia.

However, these countries also have problems. The thing is that the West was not actually ready for what is happening in Ukraine today. Most of all, the American army participated in the hostilities, but in fact it was fighting with partisans who did not have modern weapons. The same NATO recognized that the amount of artillery used in Ukraine is "staggering." In Afghanistan, the United States fired 300 shells a day and it was considered a lot, and the air was not even monitored there. One day in Ukraine can be counted for a month of fighting in Afghanistan, the alliance said.

Now NATO is sorely lacking precisely "consumables", i.e. ammunition, ATGM, MANPADS, etc., in general, everything that is needed on the battlefield. It takes time to replenish these reserves, and the West does not have it. Meanwhile, Kiev continues to demand more and more weapons.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 14.04 14:29
Непослушный вассал Вашингтона и нерукопожатные политики Прибалтики
  • 14.04 10:49
  • 15522
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 14.04 10:44
  • 1073
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 14.04 08:50
  • 1
В России изучили поврежденный Ираном американский KC-135R
  • 14.04 08:46
  • 1
В Казани впервые показали макет нового самолета Ту-454
  • 14.04 04:29
  • 4
Летные испытания самолета Як-130М продлятся до 2028 года
  • 14.04 01:39
  • 1
Why did the United States invent "Chinese weapons for Iran"
  • 13.04 18:30
  • 1
Турция вышла на второе место в НАТО по числу строящихся кораблей для ВМС
  • 13.04 18:30
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему британский флот не решился останавливать фрегаты Путина в Ла-Манше? (The Telegraph UK, Великобритания)"
  • 13.04 18:06
  • 1
Минобороны Финляндии приобрело дополнительные 155-мм самоходные гаубицы K9
  • 13.04 17:42
  • 1
The "Neptunes" of the Ukrainian Armed Forces destroyed houses in the Bryansk region. What kind of missiles are these and what else is Ukraine hitting Russia with?
  • 13.04 16:15
  • 6
В США назвали Су-57 угрозой для F-35
  • 13.04 13:49
  • 116
МС-21 готовится к первому полету
  • 13.04 11:23
  • 1
Ядерный дрон «Посейдон» заставил США усомниться в своем оружии
  • 13.04 11:18
  • 1
Why didn't the British Navy decide to stop Putin's frigates in the English Channel? (The Telegraph UK, United Kingdom)