Войти

Former US National Security Adviser Bolton admitted that the US missile defense system is not capable of protecting against modern missiles

1620
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

The current American missile defense system is not able to protect the United States from Russian or Chinese missiles. This statement was made by Donald Trump's ex-national security aide John Bolton.

According to Bolton, which he expressed in his article for The Wall Street Journal, the American missile defense system is not able to cope with Russian and Chinese ballistic missiles, not to mention the latest developments. While the Biden administration is spending billions of dollars on anything but missile defense, Russia and China, as well as other countries, are rapidly developing their weapons.

The politician stressed that the White House urgently needs to address the issue of missile defense, since the threat today comes not only from Russia and China, but also from Iran, which has begun developing a hypersonic missile, as well as North Korea, which is successfully testing new missile weapons.

While our rivals were developing hypersonic and other threatening new technologies, the US's deterrence capabilities and the country's readiness to respond symmetrically militarily were only decreasing

Bolton wrote.

Earlier, the Pentagon said that the creation of a missile defense system capable of protecting the United States from Russian missiles is technically impossible and may require enormous costs. The anti-missiles in service with the United States are capable of intercepting only monoblock ballistic missiles, they are powerless against ICBMs with separable warheads. For 2020, 44 Ground-Based Interceptor (GBI) mine-based anti-missiles were deployed in the USA in Alaska and California, 20 more were in the plans.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 31.07 07:33
  • 0
Комментарий к "Чем же была более всего сильна промышленность Российской империи"
  • 31.07 05:53
  • 0
Комментарий к "Чего Европе ждать от задуманной США “НАТО 3.0”? (The Spectator, Великобритания)"
  • 31.07 05:08
  • 0
Комментарий к "Могла ли Россия потерпеть поражение в Первой Мировой Войне?"
  • 31.07 01:56
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему Суворов взял «неприступный» Измаил, имея меньше солдат, чем защитников"
  • 31.07 01:37
  • 1
What can Europe expect from the US-conceived “NATO 3.0”? (The Spectator, UK)
  • 31.07 01:19
  • 1
Болгария подключилась к нефтепроводу НАТО (Дума, Болгария)
  • 31.07 01:15
  • 3
На Украине отмечают рост у ВС РФ количества средств для противодействия Starlink
  • 30.07 23:32
  • 0
Комментарий к "Украина полюбила “Великую Америку”. Но не факт, что та отвечает взаимностью (Politico, США)"
  • 30.07 20:31
  • 0
КомментариИ к "Вечные темы для споров: победное шествие советской власти"
  • 30.07 20:29
  • 1
Комментарий к "Почему современная философия бесполезна? Как возродить её практическую силу"
  • 30.07 18:06
  • 2
Комментарий к "Страсти по «Арене-М»: изобрела ли Россия панацею для защиты танков от FPV-дронов?"
  • 30.07 16:19
  • 1
Принцип работы глушителя ВС России спутников Starlink объяснили
  • 30.07 15:58
  • 1
Объявлено о воссоздании Высшего училища подводников
  • 30.07 15:31
  • 16346
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 30.07 15:20
  • 8
Дуров: Чиновнику, «сломавшему интернет» в РФ, американцы должны вручить медаль