Войти

Bloomberg: The war in Ukraine has shown that the US is not yet ready for a military confrontation with China

2005
1
0

Image source: topwar.ru

Professor at Johns Hopkins University Hal brands in an article for Bloomberg expressed the view that the United States needs to do the conclusion of the conflict in Ukraine. In particular, the Pentagon needs to understand that modern warfare requires a huge amount of ammunition and the amount of weapons.

The expert noted that the war in Ukraine is not a confrontation between two great powers. Meanwhile, the high intensity of the fighting that requires incredible amount of weapons, without which you will not be able to achieve results on the fronts.

The brands recalled that at the beginning of the confrontation between Ukraine and Russia, the United States gave Kiev a third of its stockpile of anti-tank Javelin. Now the American military-industrial complex will take years to produce this amount of weapons.

In addition, according to American Professor, the successful application of Ukrainian troops MLRS HIMARS obliges US to provide Kiev more such weapons. However, these systems occupy a Central place in the American army. If their number will be significantly reduced, for US it will be a factor that can affect national security.

In the end, the Pentagon is extremely difficult to balance between the allies and the satisfaction of their own needs for weapons, as the US army now and she is experiencing some deficiency in the latter.

Based on the foregoing, Hal brands have concluded that the war in Ukraine have shown the lack of U.S. readiness for a military confrontation with China. At least it is obvious that the Pentagon today, it will be extremely difficult to maintain a full supply of the army in the event of a direct military confrontation with China over Taiwan. But the Biden openly threatened China's military support of Taipei from Washington.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Comments [1]
№1
20.09.2022 05:33
Цитата, q
Профессор Университета Джона Хопкинса
- Джонса Хопкинса? Хоть бы название университета выучили в военном обозрении.
0
Inform
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.10 17:36
С широко закрытыми глазами
  • 05.10 15:13
  • 1
The lead Italian destroyer of the new generation has been ordered
  • 05.10 14:51
  • 1
Hunters of the "small sky"
  • 05.10 05:54
  • 0
Комментарий к "Рванет не там, где все думают. Вот где «откроются ворота» третьей мировой"
  • 05.10 05:24
  • 1
"On the threshold of a new reality": Putin's main theses at the Valdai Forum
  • 05.10 04:53
  • 1
Trump redirected “Ukrainian” aid for NATO countries to Latin American allies (The Telegraph UK, UK)
  • 05.10 04:16
  • 1
The European elite has gone to war — and is rapidly losing voters (The American Conservative, USA)
  • 05.10 03:44
  • 1
На учениях «Центр» показали «Изделие 347» с управляемой ракетой
  • 04.10 21:24
  • 1
Ex-NATO official: Russia considers itself the winner, and, in my opinion, for good reason (The Independent, UK)
  • 04.10 05:13
  • 0
Комментарий к "Русские не решатся: В НАТО посмеялись над ядерным оружием Москвы. Первый удар должна принять Польша"
  • 02.10 20:09
  • 0
Комментарий к "Вашингтон обозначил неугодные ему страны НАТО" и "«НАТО 3.0»: По какому принципу Вашингтон делит союзников"
  • 02.10 17:40
  • 0
Бадалян: Пашинян проигнорировал саммит ЕАЭС из-за созданного им образа «врага» в лице Лукашенко
  • 02.10 17:34
  • 0
«Это будет другая геополитическая реальность»: в Беларуси жестко предупредили Запад о последствиях провокаций
  • 02.10 03:57
  • 1
Путин поставил кабмину новую задачу в сфере искусственного интеллекта
  • 02.10 03:47
  • 1
Washington has identified the NATO countries it dislikes