Войти

Bloomberg: The war in Ukraine has shown that the US is not yet ready for a military confrontation with China

1953
1
0

Image source: topwar.ru

Professor at Johns Hopkins University Hal brands in an article for Bloomberg expressed the view that the United States needs to do the conclusion of the conflict in Ukraine. In particular, the Pentagon needs to understand that modern warfare requires a huge amount of ammunition and the amount of weapons.

The expert noted that the war in Ukraine is not a confrontation between two great powers. Meanwhile, the high intensity of the fighting that requires incredible amount of weapons, without which you will not be able to achieve results on the fronts.

The brands recalled that at the beginning of the confrontation between Ukraine and Russia, the United States gave Kiev a third of its stockpile of anti-tank Javelin. Now the American military-industrial complex will take years to produce this amount of weapons.

In addition, according to American Professor, the successful application of Ukrainian troops MLRS HIMARS obliges US to provide Kiev more such weapons. However, these systems occupy a Central place in the American army. If their number will be significantly reduced, for US it will be a factor that can affect national security.

In the end, the Pentagon is extremely difficult to balance between the allies and the satisfaction of their own needs for weapons, as the US army now and she is experiencing some deficiency in the latter.

Based on the foregoing, Hal brands have concluded that the war in Ukraine have shown the lack of U.S. readiness for a military confrontation with China. At least it is obvious that the Pentagon today, it will be extremely difficult to maintain a full supply of the army in the event of a direct military confrontation with China over Taiwan. But the Biden openly threatened China's military support of Taipei from Washington.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Comments [1]
№1
20.09.2022 05:33
Цитата, q
Профессор Университета Джона Хопкинса
- Джонса Хопкинса? Хоть бы название университета выучили в военном обозрении.
0
Inform
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.08 15:36
  • 16358
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 05.08 06:28
  • 0
Комментарий к "Карл Маркс: философия, революции и геополитика — почему его идеи актуальны до сих пор"
  • 05.08 05:06
  • 0
Комментарий к "ПО СУЩЕСТВУ"
  • 05.08 02:36
  • 1
Ответ на вопрос "А стоит ли цитировать маршала Жукова"
  • 05.08 01:47
  • 0
Комментарий к "Рукопись о Баскервилях: деталь, после которой дело Холмса становится другим"
  • 05.08 01:04
  • 0
Комментарий к "Правда ли, что Россия проиграла Первую мировую из-за отсталости? Вся правда о главной военной лжи века"
  • 04.08 22:58
  • 0
Комментарий к "Медленное угасание "коалиции желающих" (The Telegraph UK, Великобритания)"
  • 04.08 20:17
  • 0
Комментарий к "Закладка, определившая эпоху: день рождения двух морских легенд" и "Испытание океаном: история головного эсминца проекта 956, который дал имя серии"
  • 04.08 07:03
  • 1
Китайские ученые сделали ночное видение полноцветным
  • 04.08 04:51
  • 1
The slow decline of the "coalition of the willing" (The Telegraph UK, UK)
  • 04.08 01:30
  • 1
Комментарий к "Голодомор. Ложь и факты"
  • 04.08 01:09
  • 1
Комментарий к "Нравственный вакуум: Может ли атеизм обосновать добро? Христианство как опора человечности"
  • 04.08 00:17
  • 0
Комментарий к "Города-предатели, встречавшие немцев как освободителей"
  • 03.08 23:00
  • 1
Solidly built: how do mobile firing groups work on the Tigers
  • 03.08 22:59
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему Красная Армия не смогла прорвать линию Маннергейма три месяца"