Войти

The IAEA Board of Governors adopted a resolution calling on Russia to withdraw its forces from the NPP

1995
0
-1
Image source: Сергей Мальгавко/ТАСС

The Council believes that the presence of Russian forces on the territory of the station "significantly increases the risk of a nuclear accident"VIENNA, September 15.

/tass/. The IAEA Board of Governors adopted a resolution calling on the Russian Federation to withdraw its forces from the territory of the Zaporozhye NPP at a closed meeting by 26 votes. This was reported on Thursday by Reuters, citing diplomatic sources.

Seven of the 35 countries represented in the Council abstained from voting, namely Burundi, Vietnam, Egypt, India, Pakistan, Senegal and South Africa. Two states - Russia and China - opposed it. The document calls on Russia to immediately cease all its actions on the territory of the NPP or on "any other nuclear facility of Ukraine."

In addition, the Council believes that the presence of Russian forces on the territory of the NPP "significantly increases the risk of a nuclear accident." The draft resolution was prepared by Canada and Poland on behalf of Ukraine, which is not a member of the IAEA Board of Governors.

The permanent mission of the Russian Federation stated that the resolution adopted by the IAEA against Russia does not take into account the systematic shelling of the NPP by the Ukrainian side.

Earlier this month, an IAEA mission headed by the organization's Director General Rafael Grossi visited the station. Later, the agency published a report calling for the creation of a safety zone around the NPP to prevent accidents due to hostilities. The Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the UN, Vasily Nebenzia, said earlier that demilitarization would not ensure the safety of the station, but would put it at risk of provocations by Ukrainian forces. 

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 01.08 02:20
  • 0
Об эсминцах, раз уж пошел разговор о возобновлении их постройки в РФ
  • 01.08 00:27
  • 0
Комментарий к "Один стационарный С-200 закрывал площадь сорока дивизионов С-75"
  • 31.07 19:20
  • 0
Комментарий к "Модернизацию атомного подводного флота назвали важнейшей задачей для развития ВМФ"
  • 31.07 19:02
  • 2
Russia has announced its first destroyer program in 40 years. Urgently needed: Ocean-going warships (Military Watch Magazine, USA)
  • 31.07 18:51
  • 0
Комментарий к "Россия объявила о первой за 40 лет программе создания эсминцев. Срочно требуются: океанские боевые корабли (Military Watch Magazine, США)"
  • 31.07 18:37
  • 16347
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 31.07 18:09
  • 1
Госкомвоенпром: ОАО "АЛЕВКУРП" усовершенствовало оптико-электронную систему для ЗРК
  • 31.07 18:00
  • 1
Модернизацию атомного подводного флота назвали важнейшей задачей для развития ВМФ
  • 31.07 17:37
  • 1
Sea revenues: The Caspian Flotilla acquired its own aircraft
  • 31.07 17:18
  • 1
Минобороны: Россия обладает опытом создания масштабных группировок ПВО
  • 31.07 07:33
  • 0
Комментарий к "Чем же была более всего сильна промышленность Российской империи"
  • 31.07 05:53
  • 0
Комментарий к "Чего Европе ждать от задуманной США “НАТО 3.0”? (The Spectator, Великобритания)"
  • 31.07 05:08
  • 0
Комментарий к "Могла ли Россия потерпеть поражение в Первой Мировой Войне?"
  • 31.07 01:56
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему Суворов взял «неприступный» Измаил, имея меньше солдат, чем защитников"
  • 31.07 01:37
  • 1
What can Europe expect from the US-conceived “NATO 3.0”? (The Spectator, UK)