Войти

The Pentagon confirmed the discussion on the supply of Western-made fighters to Ukraine

2144
0
-3

Image source: topwar.ru

The United States is considering the issue of supply American or European fighters to Ukraine, but the final decision is still pending. This was announced by the Pentagon.

On Wednesday, the Ministry of defense held a daily briefing, which raised the allocation of military assistance to Kiev, including fighter aircraft of Western origin. Rap in front of reporters had to be Deputy Secretary of defense for political Affairs Colin Kalu. A Pentagon spokesman, responding to a question on the situation of aircraft, said that he considered, but the final decision is still pending.

Fighters remain under consideration, but the final decision on this matter was not taken up

he said.

According to Kal, the supply of American or European aircraft to Ukraine now is not a priority, States are making efforts to provide the Ukrainians use of aircraft, already standing in their arms. To put it simply, the Americans are trying to supply to Ukraine, such a number of air defense systems, which could turn the tide in the sky. The fact is that neither the U.S. nor Europe has now the necessary number of SAM no, they need to produce. And give from its own reserves scary, because the conflict could go beyond Ukraine.

Continuing the theme of fighters, the Pentagon spokesman noted that although this issue is postponed, but it is possible that Kiev still get them, but only a few years.

In Kyiv for quite a long time discussing what planes Ukraine needed to counter Russian aviation. As decided in the force command of the APU, the best option is to supply two American fighters F-16 and F-15.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Продукция
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 04:13
  • 0
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"