Войти

There were shots with the movement of a column of MaxxPro armored vehicles delivered for the APU

2829
1
0

Image source: topwar.ru

NATO countries are seeking to replace classic armored personnel carriers with MRAP-type armored vehicles in their troops, which have increased mine protection. In many ways, this rearmament was a response to the military actions of the alliance's allies in the Middle East. In the countries of this region, NATO was faced mainly with guerrilla wars, in which the main tactics of the rebels were reduced to mining the enemy's equipment routes and blasting in places where alliance forces were concentrated.

As practice has shown, NATO armored vehicles feel confident in the rocky deserts of the Middle East, but their operation is difficult in conditions of soil erosion. Despite this specificity, the Kiev regime is actively arming itself with MRAP-type equipment. In particular, American MaxxPro armored vehicles were transferred to the APU from the arsenals of the US Armed Forces. One video captures the transfer of a column of equipment consisting of 19 products of this model.

At the same time, video materials already appear on the network, indicating the limited operational capabilities of MaxxPro on the Ukrainian landscape. One of the cars was thoroughly stuck in the mud and could not get out of it without outside help. Western observers also have doubts about the increased mine protection of MRAP. As noted, the main losses of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in equipment are caused by artillery fire, and therefore vehicles designed for fighting with partisans will not be able to effectively show themselves in battles with Russian troops.

There are up to two dozen American-made MaxxPro armored vehicles in the column, and some of them have desert camouflage, and other armored vehicles in the same column have green "army" colors.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Проекты
Comments [1]
№1
16.08.2022 12:22
Почему не уничтожили, если знали?
0
Inform
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 22.03 04:15
  • 16
Мультизадачная гиперзвуковая БРСД на "стэлс" платформах, как условие неядерного сдерживания
  • 22.03 04:05
  • 733
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 21.03 22:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Названы российские подлодки 2050-х"
  • 21.03 21:16
  • 0
По поводу "Что было бы, если Российская империя продолжала бы существовать".
  • 21.03 19:40
  • 0
Что было бы, если Российская Империя продолжала бы существовать? (литературный ответ)
  • 21.03 19:01
  • 0
Что было бы, если Российская Империя продолжала бы существовать?
  • 21.03 18:48
  • 15061
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 20.03 18:43
  • 2
Патрушев: наша военная наука не отстает, а во многом опережает зарубежные разработки в области морских дронов
  • 20.03 11:55
  • 2
Прогнозируемая стоимость создания системы ПРО США "Золотой купол" выросла до 185 млрд. долл.
  • 20.03 00:53
  • 0
К вопросу о стратегии России в сложившейся ситуации.
  • 19.03 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "Проект: ядерное не сдерживание"
  • 19.03 18:38
  • 1
Названо количество запущенных Киевом ракет SCALP и Storm Shadow с начала СВО
  • 19.03 16:04
  • 0
Проект: ядерное не сдерживание
  • 19.03 14:27
  • 0
Москва — Минск: углубление интеграции – закономерно, естественно и взаимовыгодно
  • 19.03 13:39
  • 2
Why didn't China rush to defend Iran