Войти

Why won't the Abrams and Leopards-2 be handed over to the Ukrainian army

2391
0
0

Image Source: Photo: Bravery2004

The Ukrainian army is currently entirely dependent on foreign supplies. This applies, among other things, to ammunition, artillery weapons, armored vehicles.

For example, military experts note that the number of T-72 tanks supplied from Eastern Europe, apparently, has already equaled or even exceeded the number of T-64 tanks that survived after suffering huge losses.

However, even if all the "seventy-second" remaining in Eastern Europe are sent to the APU, then we can only talk about temporary qualitative improvement. The fact is that outdated export versions, created more than forty years ago, have been delivered to Ukraine for a long time, which are very difficult to bring to the modern level. Therefore, they are very vulnerable on the battlefield.

Interestingly, their crews understand this very well and therefore very often abandon tanks.

Judging by various statements, the command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine dreams of German Leopards-2, Abrams, but it is unlikely that they will ever be given modern versions, and, let's say, the stored M1A1 are also outdated. Compared to diesel cars, they are more complex and expensive to operate. In addition, restoration repairs will be needed, and this will take a lot of time and will require additional costs.

There are also problems with Leopards-2. No country currently operating modern versions wants to part with them. There are a number of Leopard-2A4S, but they compromised themselves during the fighting in Syria, where they were easily hit by not the newest ATGMs, such as the "Competition", in addition, most of them also require repair. So, in the foreseeable future, the APU will definitely not have anything newer than the T-72.

Lev Romanov

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Продукция
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 19.03 09:25
  • 691
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 19.03 03:14
  • 1
ЦАМТО: союзники США заняли выжидательную позицию после призыва Трампа отправить корабли в Персидский залив
  • 19.03 01:30
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США назвали оружие для удара по кораблям Китая"
  • 19.03 00:39
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США назвали Су-57 угрозой для F-35"
  • 19.03 00:36
  • 15034
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 18.03 11:10
  • 2
Во Франции обеспокоились российскими ракетами
  • 18.03 10:55
  • 1
США потеряли около 12 БЛА MQ-9 Reaper в ходе вооруженного конфликта с Ираном
  • 18.03 10:50
  • 1
The engineer received three years for passing on the secrets of Varshavyanka
  • 18.03 01:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "Полковник перечислил самое мощное оружие России в зоне СВО"
  • 17.03 21:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "НАТО усиливает патрулирование в Арктике. Главная цель — обнаружить российские подлодки, пока они не ушли на глубину (Business Insider, Германия)"
  • 17.03 21:00
  • 0
Комментарий к "Может ли НАТО разместить ядерное оружие в Финляндии? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 17.03 19:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "США ударом ATACMS затопили российскую «Варшавянку» в Иране"
  • 17.03 18:49
  • 2
США ударом ATACMS затопили российскую «Варшавянку» в Иране
  • 17.03 18:31
  • 1
Why didn't China rush to defend Iran
  • 17.03 17:04
  • 0
Польша между двух огней