Войти

The UK is going to transfer warships to Ukraine, but there are questions about their basing

1777
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

Warships from the Royal Navy of Great Britain may be transferred to Ukraine in the near future. This was stated by the Ambassador of Ukraine in London Vadim Prystaiko.

According to the diplomat, the UK will hand over anti-mine ships to Kiev. Currently, Prystaiko noted, Ukrainian sailors are undergoing appropriate training on ships of the Royal Navy. After all, they have not encountered Western technology before.

The need for warships in Ukraine is not just great, but huge. In fact, the Ukrainian naval forces ceased to exist in the first months of the Russian special military operation. Although even before that, Ukraine could not boast of a powerful naval force.

The question is different – where will these ships be based and where is the guarantee that they will not be destroyed in the first days after their transfer to Kiev by Great Britain? After all, the ship is not a multiple rocket launcher system, you can't hide it on the territory of some enterprise.

Accordingly, as soon as the ships appear, for example, in the port of Odessa, they can be immediately destroyed by Russian missile strikes. To deliver these strikes, the Russian fleet will not even need to approach Odessa. The fate of Ukrainian sailors "undergoing training in the UK" will be unenviable, as the Ukrainian ambassador told about them.

In addition, the very fact of the continued supply of weapons, including now warships, testifies to the persistent unwillingness of the West to end the conflict in Ukraine. Or does the British leadership just want to dispose of its old ships, while at the same time hanging debt obligations for them on Kiev?

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 21.07 20:17
  • 5
Комментарий к "Жуткий схематизм в теории прибавочной стоимости Маркса и ее научная несостоятельность."
  • 21.07 18:44
  • 16316
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 21.07 12:49
  • 1
Greetings to Odessa: Russia has begun to completely isolate Ukraine from the Black Sea
  • 21.07 05:46
  • 8
Пентагон впервые за 20 лет скрыл отчет о недостатках истребителей F-35
  • 21.07 03:48
  • 1
Российские порты прикрыли «Корветом»
  • 21.07 03:43
  • 1
США создали дешевый Patriot
  • 21.07 03:35
  • 1
Will the Europeans fight if it comes to that? (The Economist, UK)
  • 20.07 18:15
  • 0
Комментарий к "Какой танк лучше: Challenger 2 или Т-72. Сравнительный обзор (Часть 3)"
  • 20.07 15:47
  • 1
An unmanned project
  • 20.07 12:23
  • 198
Russia has launched production of 20 Tu-214 aircraft
  • 20.07 06:19
  • 0
Комментарий к "Какой танк лучше: M1 Abrams или Т-90. Сравнительный обзор"
  • 20.07 05:26
  • 0
По поводу ОЧЕНЬ интересной темы - сравнения танков.
  • 19.07 19:21
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему Первую Мировую войну «забыли»?"
  • 19.07 03:37
  • 0
Комментарий к "Могла ли Россия избежать участия в Первой Мировой?"
  • 19.07 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Лучше быть голодными, чем русскими»: Шахназаров узнал от латыша, почему Латвия так относится к России"