Войти

In the USA, they doubted the capabilities of the "Iron Dome"

2164
0
0
Image source: Israel Defense Forces

The United States explained Israel's unwillingness to supply the Iron Dome missile defense system to Ukraine. Russian missiles can reveal the shortcomings of the Israeli system, writes The National Interest.

It is noted that the supply of the "Iron Dome" could be refused due to difficulties with logistics. This decision could also be influenced by the Russian presence in Syria.

"These explanations deserve attention. But perhaps there is another reason why Israeli leaders are not too eager to deploy the Iron Dome in Ukraine: their concern that the Iron Dome technology is not as reliable as advertised," the newspaper writes.

The criterion for the effectiveness of the missile defense system is the number of civilians affected by missile strikes and the interception coefficient. The publication says that these indicators were the same during Operation Cast Lead and during Operation Cloud Pillar, which began after the deployment of the Iron Dome missile defense system.

The National Interest writes that the effectiveness of the system determines the lack of demand for the "Iron Dome".

The publication also notes that the use of the "Iron Dome" in Ukraine can reveal the shortcomings of the system. "Israeli military planners are fully aware that Russia's diverse fleet of modern missiles can reveal serious shortcomings of weapons that in recent years have become a symbol of national pride and military valor," the article says.

In April, it became known that tests of the Iron Beam laser missile defense system had been completed in Israel. During them, the system hit mines, missiles and drones. Iron Beam will become the fifth element in Israel's layered missile defense system.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 03.04 04:44
  • 0
Комментарии к "Как усилить защиту нефтяной инфраструктуры России", и "Недружественный огонь: как Россия ответит на украинские атаки на Усть-Лугу"
  • 03.04 03:42
  • 15325
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 03.04 03:35
  • 906
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 03.04 02:42
  • 2
Западная пресса: «Россия выстроила кольцо ПВО вокруг Москвы»
  • 03.04 01:13
  • 0
Комментарий к "Трёхходовка Нетаньяху. Трамп лишь ширма? Раскрыта стратегическая игра Израиля"
  • 02.04 18:35
  • 1
Kalibry guided Indonesia to Russian submarines
  • 02.04 18:30
  • 1
Российская «Скорлупа» поступила в зону СВО
  • 02.04 18:23
  • 1
How to strengthen the protection of Russia's oil infrastructure
  • 02.04 18:15
  • 1
Unfriendly fire: how Russia will respond to the Ukrainian attacks on Ust-Luga
  • 02.04 17:58
  • 112
МС-21 готовится к первому полету
  • 02.04 17:38
  • 4
Новейший российский «Союз-5» впервые запустят 2 апреля
  • 02.04 17:34
  • 2
Experts explained the difference between the Apollo and Artemis lunar missions
  • 02.04 17:23
  • 1
Новый российский аналог Starlink: стоимость спутников может достигнуть 27 млрд рублей, а расходы на их запуск могут добавить еще десятки миллиардов
  • 02.04 03:51
  • 1
Merz goes into conflict with Trump: three main risks (Der Spiegel, Germany)
  • 01.04 21:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "Как американские подводные лодки помогли США победить в холодной войне"