Войти

In the USA, they doubted the capabilities of the "Iron Dome"

2268
0
0
Image source: Israel Defense Forces

The United States explained Israel's unwillingness to supply the Iron Dome missile defense system to Ukraine. Russian missiles can reveal the shortcomings of the Israeli system, writes The National Interest.

It is noted that the supply of the "Iron Dome" could be refused due to difficulties with logistics. This decision could also be influenced by the Russian presence in Syria.

"These explanations deserve attention. But perhaps there is another reason why Israeli leaders are not too eager to deploy the Iron Dome in Ukraine: their concern that the Iron Dome technology is not as reliable as advertised," the newspaper writes.

The criterion for the effectiveness of the missile defense system is the number of civilians affected by missile strikes and the interception coefficient. The publication says that these indicators were the same during Operation Cast Lead and during Operation Cloud Pillar, which began after the deployment of the Iron Dome missile defense system.

The National Interest writes that the effectiveness of the system determines the lack of demand for the "Iron Dome".

The publication also notes that the use of the "Iron Dome" in Ukraine can reveal the shortcomings of the system. "Israeli military planners are fully aware that Russia's diverse fleet of modern missiles can reveal serious shortcomings of weapons that in recent years have become a symbol of national pride and military valor," the article says.

In April, it became known that tests of the Iron Beam laser missile defense system had been completed in Israel. During them, the system hit mines, missiles and drones. Iron Beam will become the fifth element in Israel's layered missile defense system.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 01.07 10:46
  • 16221
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 01.07 07:32
  • 0
Комментарий к "Украина как краеугольный камень новой европейской стратегии (The National Interest, США)"
  • 01.07 05:08
  • 1
Новейший украинский ЗРК «Риф» разместили на шасси советского ЗРК «Стрела-10»
  • 01.07 02:50
  • 1
"Political question": why does Turkey want to sell the Russian S-400 to South Korea?
  • 01.07 02:31
  • 1
Ukraine as the cornerstone of a new European strategy (The National Interest, USA)
  • 01.07 00:22
  • 2
Комментарий к "В России предложен новый способ борьбы с авианосцами США"
  • 30.06 23:56
  • 1
Британия отказалась от новых эсминцев в пользу гибридных кораблей с БЛА
  • 30.06 23:21
  • 0
Комментарий к "НАТО под давлением, Европе предстоит крупнейшее перевооружение в истории (El Pais, Испания)"
  • 30.06 23:06
  • 1
Why does Russia need a new tank school in the UAV era
  • 30.06 22:57
  • 1
В США оценили воздушный компонент ядерной триады России
  • 30.06 18:38
  • 3
В Госдуме предложили приравнять к госизмене коррупцию в военной сфере
  • 30.06 18:14
  • 1
ОСК создаст собственный дивизион двигателестроения
  • 30.06 11:32
  • 1
Комментарий к "Украина предложила воевать только в четырех регионах. Почему Россия на это не пойдет?"
  • 29.06 19:33
  • 0
Комментарий к "Для войны с Россией. На создании какого оружия сосредоточилась Европа"
  • 29.06 18:35
  • 2
Комментарий к "Россия задействовала свои самые тяжелые и быстрые истребители-перехватчики для стратегических задач в Арктике. Насколько эффективен МиГ-31БМ? (Military Watch Magazine, США)"