Войти

The impact is comparable to the Iskander missile defense system: the consequences of the fall of the "dummy" from the Sarmat ICBM

3501
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

After the start of the special operation of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation in Ukraine, President Vladimir Putin gave the order to transfer the country's nuclear deterrent forces to a special combat duty regime. This step was designed to prevent direct military intervention by the West in the armed conflict in Nezalezhnaya and became a guarantor of preventing a possible third World War.

Western countries with nuclear weapons are forced to reckon with the Russian ICBM arsenal, sufficient for the repeated destruction of hostile states. Earlier, during the years of the "partnership", they hoped for a gradual depletion of the nuclear forces of the Russian Federation for natural reasons, due to the physical deterioration of ICBMs. However, intensive work was carried out in Russia to restore the technical readiness of the missiles inherited from the USSR and deliveries of new Yars-type systems were carried out.

But against this background, the development of a product capable of becoming a full-fledged replacement for the Voevoda ICBM, known in the West under the designation "Satan", continued. The new Sarmat missile is capable of destroying the enemy not only through a nuclear explosion, but also through the use of conventional weapons – the Avangard hypersonic combat unit, whose kinetic energy is sufficient to defeat strategic enemy targets.

Image source: topwar.ru

Consequences of the strike of the Iskander-M OTR (left) and the Sarmat ICBM combat training unit

The high performance of the new system is indicated by the "trace" that the inert Sarmata warhead leaves after falling to the ground. After the delivery of the training "dummy" to the conditional target, a funnel with a depth of 8 and a width of 20 meters was formed on the territory of the Kamchatka landfill. This is comparable to the consequences of strikes by the Iskander-M tactical missile, in particular, during their use on AFU facilities - there are already plenty of such examples.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 01.03 14:12
  • 126
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 01.03 13:58
  • 14754
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 01.03 07:47
  • 0
Не в тему сайта, но все-таки не совсем off-top. Комментарий к "Почему в России хоккей честнее и сильнее футбола?"
  • 01.03 03:33
  • 0
В связи с происходящим: комментарий на "Сначала выведут из строя ПРО Москвы: Готов план удара по России. В ответ – ядерный взрыв у берегов Британии?"
  • 01.03 01:23
  • 1
Комментарий к "Рютте: НАТО нужно увеличить мощность ПВО в пять раз"
  • 28.02 21:05
  • 0
Комментарий к "Вмятины на атомных подлодках ВМФ России объяснили"
  • 28.02 20:09
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США ужаснулись Ирану в «безвыходном положении»"
  • 28.02 15:48
  • 1
The Russian 350nm photolithograph was estimated at 500 million rubles.
  • 28.02 07:02
  • 0
Комментарий к "Запад растранжирил годы, которые нам пожертвовала Украина (The Times, Великобритания)"
  • 27.02 11:45
  • 1
Forget about Greenland: Russia has already settled on this Arctic island of NATO (The Wall Street Journal, USA)
  • 27.02 09:07
  • 102
МС-21 готовится к первому полету
  • 27.02 07:24
  • 1
В США оценили крупнейшие танковые силы в мире
  • 27.02 06:59
  • 0
Комментарий к "США обозначили угрозу с воздуха в будущем"
  • 27.02 02:15
  • 1
The United States has identified a threat from the air in the future
  • 27.02 00:19
  • 0
Комментарий к "Российский Су-57 обвинили в изменении баланса сил в «подбрюшье НАТО»"