Войти

An American military expert talks about whether the United States will be able to win the war with China at sea

1811
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

China is doing everything to prevent the US Navy from conducting effective combat operations, in case of their occurrence. in the western Pacific Ocean and especially in the South China Sea. To do this, Beijing is steadily increasing its anti-submarine potential. The United States called this military doctrine of China "Access Denial" (Access Denial — AD). American military expert Gary Anderson in an article published on the website Military.com, discusses who will be the winner in the event of a military confrontation between America and China.

In the event of a naval conflict with the United States, China intends to use long-range missiles to destroy American bases in the region, in Japan and on Guam, in order to deprive the US army of air cover. At sea, the Chinese are going to use manned and unmanned aerial vehicles and orbital installations to strike enemy ships with cruise missiles. Beijing also plans to use submarines and small surface ships in this so-called "swarm tactics".

This is a good strategy to deter a stronger enemy, according to a military expert, but it has one significant drawback. A total blockade will not only stop the attacks of the US Navy on the Chinese mainland, but will also deprive the Chinese themselves of the opportunity to use regional sea routes. The Chinese economy is very dependent on exports, and the implementation of the plan to maximize the deterrence of enemy naval forces by all means deprives Beijing of the possibility of sending merchant ships.

The author cites the Russian-Ukrainian conflict as an example. According to the expert, Ukraine, using a small arsenal of anti-ship missiles, does not allow Russian troops to conduct amphibious operations. As a result, the movement of civilian vessels in the Black Sea is completely stopped. In this confrontation, Kiev, as stated, effectively restrains the Russian Navy with small forces, but at the same time deprives itself of the opportunity to carry out trade supplies to neighboring countries.

The authors of the "Denial of Access" doctrine count on a long confrontation with America, in fact, implementing a naval blockade of the PRC. In their opinion, this should weaken the US economy. But such a confrontation is also disastrous for China itself.

Although President Joe Biden has made contradictory statements about the US intention to defend Taiwan, it is obvious that we are moving in this direction in response to Chinese rhetoric and provocations

- the expert believes.

China needs a short war. The current situation in Ukraine shows the danger hidden in the assumptions about a short war, Anderson believes.

In this hypothetical naval confrontation between the two countries, America urgently needs to take measures to increase the number of ships in service with the US Navy. Otherwise, there is a real threat that "we will run out of ships before China runs out of smart weapons," the author of the article writes. After all, if Beijing is confident that it will be able to withstand a long-term naval confrontation with the American fleet, then it will be impossible to prevent its aggression (American interpretation) against Taiwan.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 09.07 16:09
  • 1148
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 09.07 13:43
  • 1
Американский WindRunner станет самым большим в мире транспортным самолетом
  • 09.07 13:20
  • 1
На Западе объяснили секрет успешного перехвата ВС России украинских «Фламинго»
  • 09.07 13:13
  • 10
О Су-57 - свежая (от 19 июня) статье MWM
  • 09.07 12:42
  • 16245
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 08.07 19:37
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему этот самолёт не смогла сбить ни одна из 4000 выпущенных по нему ракет"
  • 08.07 18:44
  • 0
Комментарий к "Если Европа хочет спасти НАТО, то она все делает неправильно (The New York Times, США)"
  • 08.07 13:25
  • 1
Вице-премьер Мантуров оценил потребности промышленности в кадрах до 2032 года
  • 08.07 13:15
  • 1
Россия ускоряет выпуск SJ-100: на заводе запустили схему, которой раньше не было
  • 08.07 12:59
  • 1
В правительстве заявили о проблемах дальнейшего роста ОПК
  • 08.07 05:44
  • 2
На саммите НАТО Рютте призвал к «трансатлантической революции» в сфере ОПК
  • 08.07 02:52
  • 0
Комментарий к "И-16: что один истребитель говорит о логике советского авиапрома 1930-х"
  • 08.07 00:12
  • 0
Комментарий к "Открытие «южных ворот»" и "Развязать узел: как освобождение Константиновки меняет ситуацию на фронтах СВО"
  • 07.07 13:16
  • 4
«Горы старого железа»: глава MHI об идее массового выпуска БПЛА на автозаводах
  • 06.07 19:54
  • 0
Комментарий к "Порошенко: Украина должна снова удивить мир, как уже делала это после 2014 года"