Войти

The Foreign Ministry answered the question about a tactical nuclear strike on Ukraine

2104
0
0
Image source: © РИА Новости / Максим Блинов

MOSCOW, May 10 - RIA Novosti. The principles and conditions for the use of nuclear weapons by Moscow are set out in the military doctrine of the Russian Federation, it is necessary to look for answers to the question whether a preventive tactical strike on the territory of Ukraine from Russia is possible, Deputy Foreign Minister Alexander Grushko told RIA Novosti.

"We have a military doctrine, everything is written there. It does not give any other interpretation, except what is there in black and white," Grushko said, answering the question whether Moscow excludes the possibility of a preventive tactical nuclear strike on the territory of Ukraine.

In June 2020, the foundations of the state policy of the Russian Federation in the field of nuclear deterrence were approved by the decree of the President of Russia. This document defines the principles of nuclear deterrence, as well as the conditions for the transition of the Russian Federation to the use of nuclear weapons.

According to the document, the conditions determining the possibility of the use of nuclear weapons by the Russian Federation are: the receipt of reliable information about the launch of ballistic missiles attacking the territories of Russia and (or) its allies, the use of nuclear weapons or other types of weapons of mass destruction by the enemy on the territories of Russia and (or) its allies, the enemy's impact on critically important state or military objects of the Russian Federation, the disabling of which will lead to the disruption of the response actions of nuclear forces, aggression against Russia with the use of conventional weapons, when the very existence of the state is threatened.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 12.04 16:16
  • 1061
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 12.04 13:45
  • 15503
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 12.04 07:58
  • 1
Что необходимо самолетам 5 и 6-го поколений без учета малозаметности. И какие страны в этом впереди.
  • 12.04 02:38
  • 0
Каковы перспективы боевой авиации без "малозаметности".
  • 12.04 02:08
  • 1
Комментарий к "США возвращаются к авиации 4 поколения. Почему? Разбираемся в проблеме"
  • 11.04 20:03
  • 2
The ships went: the frigate Admiral Grigorovich took two of our tankers through the English Channel
  • 11.04 19:15
  • 0
Комментарий к "Алжирский Су-57 впервые показали на качественном снимке"
  • 10.04 19:59
  • 0
Комментарий к "Ад разверзся: Зеленский взмолился о пощаде. Русские только вошли во вкус"
  • 10.04 18:49
  • 1
The structural collapse of NATO is the result of separation from reality (The Spectator, UK)
  • 10.04 17:35
  • 0
Комментарий на взгляд из 2021 г. (Чжунго цзюньван (Китай): США и Россия «демонстрируют друг другу» асимметричную боевую мощь)
  • 10.04 11:19
  • 1
Чжунго цзюньван (Китай): США и Россия «демонстрируют друг другу» асимметричную боевую мощь
  • 10.04 06:11
  • 0
Что может быть в случае возможного (но еще не "решенного") "военного отступления" Трампа в Иране.
  • 10.04 05:12
  • 4
В США назвали Су-57 угрозой для F-35
  • 10.04 05:07
  • 0
Комментарий к "Новые противокорабельные ракеты помогают Киеву бить по российской территории"
  • 10.04 04:46
  • 0
Комментарий к "Под чужим «ядерным зонтиком»: цена безопасности"