Войти

After oil, Russian uranium will also be banned. That's who will be hurt the most

3273
0
+4
Image source: © РИА Новости Руслан Кривобок

After oil, the turn will come to Russian uranium. The embargo will hit France and the United States

EU countries are striving to reduce dependence on Russian oil, gas and coal. Uranium has been ignored so far, writes iDNES. Europe and the USA buy a lot of it from Russia. Therefore, the embargo on this resource will hurt them.

iDNES

Jana Shafarzhikova (Jana Šafaříková)

The EU and NATO states are trying to reduce their dependence on Russian oil, coal and natural gas, but one resource is still being ignored. It's about uranium. EU countries, as well as the USA, buy it in large quantities from Russia.

The largest supplies of uranium to the European Union come not only from Russia, but also from the African Niger. The share of each is 20%. Another 20% of the EU receives from post-Soviet Kazakhstan.

The situation is similar across the Atlantic. The share of Russian uranium in US imports also reaches 20%, and the rest is supplied from Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan.

Dependence is also strong because Russian state-owned companies own shares in uranium mines, including in the USA, Canada and Kazakhstan. It is estimated that up to a third of the global trade in enriched uranium is mined in mines and sold by firms associated with Russia.

Due to the introduction of new and new anti-Russian sanctions, the issue of uranium had to arise sooner or later. Russia launched a military special operation in Ukraine two months ago, on February 24, but the attitude towards uranium in Europe began to change only in recent days. The embargo on enriched uranium imported from Russia is demanded, first of all, by Poland and the Baltic countries. Recently, this idea has been actively supported by the strongest European economy ― Germany.

"Berlin, through its representative to the European Union, announced the position of the German government: in addition to sanctions against Russian oil, it supports a ban on the import of Russian uranium," sources in German diplomacy report.

France's Big Nuclear Plans

This decision will not hurt Germany so much. The three remaining operating nuclear reactors in Germany are mainly powered by fuel from Russia and Kazakhstan. But, according to the plans for the transition to renewable sources, these power plants are scheduled to be closed by the end of this year. Thus, Germany will not suffer much from a disruption in uranium supplies, especially if they begin towards the end of the year. But things are different with France. Its approach to nuclear power sources differs from the German one.

Recently, President-elect Emmanuel Macron, for the second time, said during his first mandate that, unlike Germany, which considers nuclear power plants an unacceptable source of energy in the coming years, France will build new reactors and support nuclear energy. By 2050, according to him, it is planned to build 14 more nuclear reactors.

Macron calls his plans an atomic renaissance, which will reduce carbon emissions from burning non-renewable sources. In addition, it will support scientific research and innovation with large-scale financing and investment in the industry. Uranium sanctions would bring problems to France also because the French semi-state energy company EDF closely cooperates with Russian Rosatom on some projects.

Own sources or the USA?

The eastern countries of the European Union import the most Russian uranium. For example, Slovakia is already thinking about its own sources of uranium. In the future, its production is possible in the east of the country, where there are two large deposits. The inhabitants of this area, who, however, have long been opposed to mining, must agree to it. If the agreement is eventually reached, production will still begin no earlier than in a few years.

An alternative for Slovakia and other European countries can be offered by the American Westinghouse. But experts doubt that it is able to compensate for such large volumes.

The situation is further complicated by the fact that deposits in the United States are often located in protected natural complexes and in territories inhabited by indigenous Indian tribes.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
Original publication
InoSMI materials contain ratings exclusively from foreign media and do not reflect the editorial board's position ВПК.name
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 20.07 18:15
  • 0
Комментарий к "Какой танк лучше: Challenger 2 или Т-72. Сравнительный обзор (Часть 3)"
  • 20.07 15:47
  • 1
An unmanned project
  • 20.07 15:24
  • 16312
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 20.07 12:29
  • 7
Пентагон впервые за 20 лет скрыл отчет о недостатках истребителей F-35
  • 20.07 12:23
  • 198
Russia has launched production of 20 Tu-214 aircraft
  • 20.07 06:19
  • 0
Комментарий к "Какой танк лучше: M1 Abrams или Т-90. Сравнительный обзор"
  • 20.07 05:26
  • 0
По поводу ОЧЕНЬ интересной темы - сравнения танков.
  • 20.07 04:16
  • 0
Комментарий к "Жуткий схематизм в теории прибавочной стоимости Маркса и ее научная несостоятельность."
  • 19.07 19:21
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему Первую Мировую войну «забыли»?"
  • 19.07 03:37
  • 0
Комментарий к "Могла ли Россия избежать участия в Первой Мировой?"
  • 19.07 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Лучше быть голодными, чем русскими»: Шахназаров узнал от латыша, почему Латвия так относится к России"
  • 19.07 02:33
  • 0
Комментарий к "Мифы о нелепых атаках"
  • 19.07 01:54
  • 0
Комментарий к "ИХ ПЛАНЫ"
  • 19.07 01:42
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему Александр Зиновьев 21 год воевал с СССР, а вернулся его защищать"
  • 19.07 00:02
  • 0
Комментарий к "Бюсты Николая II по всей России — символ возрождения или подготовка к краху"