Войти

Turkey has ruled out the passage of NATO warships through the Straits to the Black Sea

1410
0
+1

Image source: topwar.ru

Turkey has ruled out the passage of warships of any countries, including NATO, through the Black Sea Straits into the Black Sea. According to the country's Defense Ministry, Ankara will firmly adhere to the Montreux Convention.

Turkish Defense Minister Hulusi Akar ruled out the passage of warships of any countries into the Black Sea while the Russian special operation in Ukraine lasts. According to him, Turkey is firmly committed to the implementation of the Montreux Convention, so the straits are closed.

In addition, the Turkish minister drew attention to the appearance of drifting naval mines in the Black Sea and did not rule out that this was done with the intent to put pressure on Ankara in order to allow minesweepers and other NATO warships to enter the Black Sea, ostensibly to search for and destroy mines. However, Turkey will cope on its own, the investigation of where these mines came from is already underway.

(...) We have a suspicion about the deliberate appearance of mines. Perhaps they were released as part of some plan to put pressure on us in order to let NATO minesweepers into the Black Sea. But we are committed to the Montreux rules and will not allow warships to enter the Black Sea, nor will we allow the Black Sea to be drawn into the war

Akar said.

Earlier, Turkey closed the Bosphorus and the Dardanelles for the passage of Russian and Ukrainian warships, while the ban does not apply to warships returning to their naval bases stationed in the Black Sea. Then the Turks completely closed the straits to any warships of non-Black Sea states, using the Montreux Convention.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Проекты
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 02.01 20:18
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 19:50
  • 12611
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"
  • 02.01 02:14
  • 14
World Time of Troubles: does Europe really want to fight - TASS Opinions
  • 01.01 06:45
  • 16
В России собрались использовать для перевозки пассажиров дирижабли
  • 01.01 05:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "Риск самосбывающихся пророчеств: какие угрозы видит российский сенатор"
  • 01.01 00:18
  • 0
О концепции "молниеносного глобального удара (Prompt global strike)"
  • 31.12 22:15
  • 0
О развитии ВМФ РФ
  • 31.12 21:13
  • 0
О "модернизации российской ядерной триады"
  • 31.12 19:49
  • 0
Комментарий к "США предупредили о «ценном активе Путина»"
  • 31.12 07:30
  • 0
Комментарий к "Фатальный провал США скажется на морском соперничестве с Китаем"
  • 31.12 01:20
  • 0
Комментарий к "Провал «самого смертоносного истребителя США» оправдали"
  • 30.12 22:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "Полюбит ли весь мир Су-57 с новым двигателем? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 30.12 20:21
  • 0
Комментарий к "Российские военные до конца года получат 16 серийных танков "Армата" - газета"