Войти

Former US Congressman: The US military-industrial complex requires unprecedented budget expenditures

1457
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

The budget of the US defense program is growing more and more. The rationale for this is the need to confront Russia and China. According to former US Congressman David Stockman, the US military budget did not see such money at the height of the Cold War.

The Biden administration has decided to spend a fantastic $831 billion on defense needs in 2023.

Stockman called the US military-industrial complex (MIC) a bubble, which requires budget expenditures unprecedented in the history of mankind, for the justification of which various research organizations work at the country's MIC.

The former congressman recalls that during the presidency of Dwight Eisenhower, when the United States was "opposed by the powerful Soviet Union," US military spending was much lower than it is now. With the collapse of the USSR, there is no real country that could threaten the United States, however, according to Stockman, "the American military machine did not retire."

It seems that after the end of the Cold War, defense spending was supposed to decrease, but under Clinton, Bush, and subsequent presidents, the Pentagon budget only increased.

For comparison: the military budgets of the two "worst" enemies of the United States and NATO – China and Russia – account for 25 and 5.5% of the American, respectively. In addition, as Stockman argues, the threat of the PRC looks doubtful, since China is heavily dependent on the Western market.

According to the former congressman, Washington hawks are able to create and/or relay absolute tall tales when it serves their purpose.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Проекты
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 19:50
  • 12611
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"
  • 02.01 02:14
  • 14
World Time of Troubles: does Europe really want to fight - TASS Opinions
  • 01.01 06:45
  • 16
В России собрались использовать для перевозки пассажиров дирижабли
  • 01.01 05:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "Риск самосбывающихся пророчеств: какие угрозы видит российский сенатор"
  • 01.01 00:18
  • 0
О концепции "молниеносного глобального удара (Prompt global strike)"
  • 31.12 22:15
  • 0
О развитии ВМФ РФ
  • 31.12 21:13
  • 0
О "модернизации российской ядерной триады"
  • 31.12 19:49
  • 0
Комментарий к "США предупредили о «ценном активе Путина»"
  • 31.12 07:30
  • 0
Комментарий к "Фатальный провал США скажется на морском соперничестве с Китаем"
  • 31.12 01:20
  • 0
Комментарий к "Провал «самого смертоносного истребителя США» оправдали"
  • 30.12 22:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "Полюбит ли весь мир Су-57 с новым двигателем? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 30.12 20:21
  • 0
Комментарий к "Российские военные до конца года получат 16 серийных танков "Армата" - газета"