Войти

Ukraine has developed a plan to repel the Russian landing "Neptune"

2194
0
0

Defense Express: The Navy has created a layered defense system with the Neptune complex

The Naval Forces of Ukraine (VMSU) conducted a number of exercises to prepare for the repulse of the landing forces of the Russian Navy. During the maneuvers, the coastal missile system "Neptune" was used. This is reported by Defense Express.

"Most likely, the Kremlin will decide on a large-scale amphibious operation, the zone of which will cover the ports of Nikolaev and Bolshaya Odessa. So the Russians will be able to solve two tasks at once "with one blow" — "cutting off" from the Black Sea and at least partially blocking shipping to our Black Sea ports," Defense Express writes.

To repel attacks from the sea, the Navy has developed a layered defense in which the Neptune coastal missile system will become the main weapon. In turn, to combat small-sized targets, they plan to use naval aviation and boats of the "Gyurza" and Island types. Also, the defense system will be supplemented by marine infantry units, barrel artillery, multiple rocket launchers and tanks.

The publication notes that the Ukrainian military conducted a number of exercises to practice the defense of the coast and ports. During the maneuvers in the northwestern part of the Black Sea, the calculation of the Neptune complex performed a march to a given area and made an electronic launch on the ships of a conditional enemy.

In December, the commander of the Navy Alexei Neizhpapa told about the new armament of the Ukrainian fleet. He noted that Island-type boats will receive artillery installations and missiles.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 04:13
  • 0
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"