Войти

Video: NLAW grenade launchers tested on T-72 without dynamic protection

4303
0
+2

Along with the American Javelin third-generation anti-tank complexes, NLAW rocket-propelled grenade launchers may begin to arrive in the Ukrainian army.

Currently, the characteristics and combat capabilities of these weapons are being discussed on social networks in comparison with already known RPGs or ATGMs, as well as their advantages and disadvantages

There are videos on the Internet from landfills where these armored vehicles developed more than ten years ago were tested at one time.

It can be seen that during the tests conducted at different times of the year, decommissioned T-72M and T-72M1 main battle tanks purchased in Germany, which were in service with the National People's Army of the GDR, were used as targets.

NLAW has mounted combat units that are optimized for hitting targets in their most vulnerable part - the roof.

For precise guidance, there is an inertial control system that calculates the parameters of the movement of the object of attack, as well as magnetic and optical sensors. The firing range is 800 meters, the weight is 12.5 kilograms.

Although it is claimed that such grenade launchers can easily destroy a moving enemy, in the above-mentioned videos, the "seventy-second" stand rooted to the spot, and do not intensively maneuver, do not cover themselves with aerosol curtains, besides they lack dynamic protection and anti-cumulative screens, which may significantly reduce armor penetration.

What looks good in commercials often does not demonstrate the declared characteristics in a real situation. For example, at the recent APU exercises, an attempt to test the Javelin ATGM on a tank layout showed very dubious results.


Alexey Brusilov

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 19.03 17:42
  • 704
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 19.03 16:04
  • 0
Проект: ядерное не сдерживание
  • 19.03 14:27
  • 0
Москва — Минск: углубление интеграции – закономерно, естественно и взаимовыгодно
  • 19.03 13:39
  • 2
Why didn't China rush to defend Iran
  • 19.03 11:57
  • 1
Persuasion Strike: Contrary to US statements, Iran continues to attack
  • 19.03 11:51
  • 2
ЦАМТО: союзники США заняли выжидательную позицию после призыва Трампа отправить корабли в Персидский залив
  • 19.03 01:30
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США назвали оружие для удара по кораблям Китая"
  • 19.03 00:39
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США назвали Су-57 угрозой для F-35"
  • 19.03 00:36
  • 15034
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 18.03 11:10
  • 2
Во Франции обеспокоились российскими ракетами
  • 18.03 10:55
  • 1
США потеряли около 12 БЛА MQ-9 Reaper в ходе вооруженного конфликта с Ираном
  • 18.03 10:50
  • 1
The engineer received three years for passing on the secrets of Varshavyanka
  • 18.03 01:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "Полковник перечислил самое мощное оружие России в зоне СВО"
  • 17.03 21:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "НАТО усиливает патрулирование в Арктике. Главная цель — обнаружить российские подлодки, пока они не ушли на глубину (Business Insider, Германия)"
  • 17.03 21:00
  • 0
Комментарий к "Может ли НАТО разместить ядерное оружие в Финляндии? (The National Interest, США)"