Войти

Putin: It is not difficult for the defense industry to participate in tenders of the Ministry of Health, but it is necessary to discuss orders

2422
0
0
Image source: google.com

As the general designer of Almaz-Antey Pavel Sozinov noted, the problem is that in some cases complex contracts are in effect and not always a single range of equipment is bought separately

NOVO-OGAREVO, January 5. /tass/. Russian President Vladimir Putin is convinced that there are no difficulties in the fulfillment by defense industry enterprises of complex orders placed by the Ministry of Health, but it is necessary to discuss the formation of such orders.

This opinion was expressed by the head of state at a meeting with the general designer of Almaz-Antey Pavel Sozinov. The President asked how the company is building relations with the Ministry of Health and other departments. Sozinov complained that the process is difficult.

"No, it's not difficult. It is difficult for you, but not difficult for those who form these orders. Therefore, we need to talk about this separately," Putin said.

According to Sozinov, the problem is that in some cases there are complex contracts and not always a single range of equipment is bought separately. "It is often played out at the level of tenders, where a large amount of equipment and equipment is included in the tender, which is not, for example, only radiography, but a lot of other things that, say, we do not produce, but someone else produces. Very often, naturally, "foreign" manufacturers get there. And it's difficult," the general designer of Almaz-Antey expressed his position, acknowledging that there is such a question.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Компании
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 04:13
  • 0
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"